Before getting into this discussion let us first take a look at this word, Agape.  It is a Greek word that most church goers have heard countless sermons with this word as the subject.  The word Agape is translated in our English New Testament texts as simply “love”.

Agape love is an unconditional love; a God like love.  There are also two other Greek words that are translated into English simply as love in our New Testament.  The other two Greek words that are translated as “love” in the New Testament are, Eros and Philos.  Eros is an erotic or sensual love.  Philos is a love like that between dear friends.

The reason that this is important is because many Christian leaders and so-called Christian leaders seem to be confused about the differences in the types of love that are found in scripture, as well as to whom these apply.  This is incorrect or sloppy understanding of love is tainting their views and teachings concerning Illegal Aliens.

One verse that is often quoted by proponents of Illegal Aliens being granted easy access to citizenship is the last portion of Matthew 19:19 which says, “Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself”.  Even without looking at the Greek text, one can ascertain easily that this is referring to Agape love.  It is not natural for humans to love others, even those they truly love, the same as they love themselves.  This kind of love demands help from God Himself for we humans cannot exhibit this kind of love with the Almighty’s help.  A quick look at the Greek text also reveals that yes indeed; the verse is referring to Agape love.

I have two questions for liberals now that use this particular verse, Matthew 19:19 to prove that we should throw open the borders to everyone because after all we are commanded to love our neighbors, Mexican citizens, as ourselves.

1.)  Was Jesus commanding this to the government of the day or to His followers who we call Christians today?

2.)  Do you leftists really want the government to attempt to display a God kind of love toward everyone?

If you’re a leftist and you answered “Yes” to the second question, doesn’t it go against the separation of church and state, that you hold dear, for the government to display a God kind of love toward people?  By the way Mr. or Mrs. Liberal, find for me the wording or concept in the constitution of this separation of church and state other then the 1st Amendment which tells the government to keep its grubby hands off of the church and its matters.  The constitution never tells the church to stay out of politics or the government’s business.

Katharine Jefferts Schori, Presiding Bishop of the Episcopal Church said,

The role of the prophetic tradition is to challenge laws and structures that appear to be unjust. . . . We are meant to see every human being as our neighbor.

So the government is meant to see every human being as our neighbor, or the government is supposed to have UNCONDITIONAL LOVE for EVERY human being?  This is so ludicrous that only a mind numbed robot of leftist propaganda would buy into it.

Just as an aside, the book of 1Timothy 3:2 says, “A bishop then must be blameless, the husband of one wife”.  One wife?  I’m guessing that the Episcopal Church is abiding by scripture and that Mr. Katherine Jefferts Schori has a lady like name for a man.

Exit Question: Why all the debate about this in the first place when you leftist Democrat socialists will vote before a bill is written, lie about what will be in it and then never read it?

President Obama is once again lying about the Arizona law.  Or is he lying about it for the first time since the last time he spoke incorrectly about it, he had not even read the law.  (Do Democrats just not read anything these days for crying out loud???)  And these stupid people aren’t shy about running their mouths concerning something they know nothing about, not having read the language in the law.  This would be funny if it were a sitcom and not reality.  The stupidest and most inexperienced among us are running our country into the ground and turning it into a third world nation before our eyes.

The feckless president said,

Laws like Arizona’s put huge pressures on local law enforcement to enforce rules that ultimately are unenforceable. It puts pressure on already hard-strapped state and local budgets.

It is unbelievable that a dunce like this could be elected in this great nation!  Mr. President, that is the point!  You are not doing your job of securing the border so the local and state governments are forced to do the job for you.  Get off the freaking golf courses and do your JOB!!!  Mr. President, are you really this vapid?  REALLY?

Then he went on to say this gem of illogic nonsense.

It makes it difficult for people here illegally to report crimes -– driving a wedge between communities and law enforcement, making our streets more dangerous and the jobs of our police officers more difficult.

Elections matter folks and this one was so crucial because we now have a knot-head in the White House who is just an embarrassment.    This is just absurd.  To say that the Arizona law makes it more difficult for illegals to report crimes that they shouldn’t be witness to in the first place if they weren’t here illegally in the first place.  Is this guy really a grown up?  The streets are more unsafe in Arizona BECAUSE of the illegal aliens, not because they won’t report crimes.  Also, if we thought these were upstanding citizens who would report a crime, my guess is they wouldn’t be here illegally in the first place, you idiotic moron.  I just couldn’t believe what I was hearing during this left wing psychobabble of a speech.

These laws also have the potential of violating the rights of innocent American citizens and legal residents, making them subject to possible stops or questioning because of what they look like or how they sound.

I am guessing that at this late stage in the process of the Arizona law, someone in the administration has taken the time to read this bill.  So again, the president is lying his face off while saying that people will stopped based on the way they look or sound and asked to provide proof of citizenship.  This is a lie!  Below is an excerpt from the Arizona law which can be read in its entirety here http://www.azleg.gov/legtext/49leg/2r/bills/sb1070s.pdf.

Sec. 2. Title 11, chapter 7, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended by adding article 8, to read: ARTICLE 8. ENFORCEMENT OF IMMIGRATION LAWS 11-1051.   Cooperation and assistance in enforcement of immigration laws; indemnification

B. FOR ANY LAWFUL CONTACT MADE BY A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL OR AGENCY OF THIS STATE OR A COUNTY, CITY, TOWN OR OTHER POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS STATE WHERE REASONABLE SUSPICION EXISTS THAT THE PERSON IS AN ALIEN WHO IS UNLAWFULLY PRESENT IN THE UNITED STATES, A REASONABLE ATTEMPT SHALL BE MADE, WHEN PRACTICABLE, TO DETERMINE THE IMMIGRATION STATUS OF THE PERSON. THE PERSON’S IMMIGRATION STATUS SHALL BE VERIFIED WITH THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT PURSUANT TO 8 UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 1373(c).

The law states that for any lawful contact made by a policeman or agency where suspicion exists that the person being dealt with is an illegal alien a reasonable attempt will be made to determine the person’s immigration status.

In the first place if a person is stopped for speeding or even for jaywalking the first thing an officer does is ask for a driver’s license or an identification card.  If this can’t be produced the next logical step is to determine if the person is supposed to be on our streets in the first place, whether the person is an American citizen or an illegal alien.

Again people are not being stopped or questioned because of how they look or talk.  People will be pulled over for infractions in respect to laws and if citizenship or immigration status cannot be verified, the federal government will be contacted to assist in verifying who the person is.

Then Obama makes another absurd argument.  I hope he uses better arguments than this with Michelle.

And as other states and localities go their own ways, we face the prospect that different rules for immigration will apply in different parts of the country -– a patchwork of local immigration rules where we all know one clear national standard is needed.

So if states have immigration laws that differ from each other, we’re going to have anarchy?  Then he uses a ploy to try to get us all to agree with him by saying that, “we all know one clear national standard is needed”.  Well, if WE ALL KNOW THIS, then I don’t want to be the one person in the United States who doesn’t know, so count me in Mr. President.  But we don’t ALL know this or agree that one national standard is needed, especially if that standard is going to come from the lying Obama regime.  Coming from the Obama regime the national standard would be clear as in clearly WRONG for America.

Exit Question: Why can this president not make a coherent presentation even though he reads his speeches word by word from his teleprompter.  (Wonder if his teleprompter has read the Arizona Immigration law.)

At one time Joseph “Big F’n Deal” Biden was known as the dumbest senator in office. Now he’s the dumbest VP our country has ever had. He keeps reminding us of this by saying stupid things.

The latest stupid statement coming from our lowly esteemed VP is an email appeal for cash in which “Big F’n Deal” Biden compares the GOP to Nazis saying the GOP will “blitzkrieg” the Allied Forces which are the peace loving, tolerant, kind worded, and intellectual Democrat Party. In this email beg for cash “Big F’n Deal” said,

As things heat up, you can expect House Democrats will be hit with a GOP blitzkrieg of vicious Swift-Boat-style attack ads, Karl Rove-inspired knockout tactics, thinly veiled attempts at character assassination and tea party disruptions.

Our Democratic allies in the House need your help, and the President and I hope we can count on you to come to their defense so we can hold onto our Democratic Majority and continue moving American forward in a new direction.

Mr. “Big F’n Deal”, by swift-boat style attack adds do you mean adds that tell the truth about Democrats?  Of course we know that any add that tells of a Democrat’s voting record is regarded as an attack simply because the Democrats legislate far to the left of the way the American people live their lives.

The “tea party disruptions” remark is evidently preparing the Democrats who will face angry people as they conduct town hall meetings and as they campaign.  The Democrats, including the dunce of a VP, don’t seem to realize that the majority of Americans want fiscal accountability from our elected officials.  The Tea Party assemblies simply give these Americans a voice.

As to Biden’s comment about “Karl Rove-inspired knockout tactics”, I have no idea what he is referring to there.  Not knowing what “Big F’n Deal” is talking about is no bother to me as he quite often makes no sense, sometimes for entire speeches.  As an aside, his best speeches seem to be those that he “borrowed” from others.

“GOP blitzkrieg” is a rather unfortunate term for any Democrat to use these days.  Of course Mr. “Big F’n Deal” didn’t mean this as a thinly veiled attempt at character assassination, as Democrats are above such uses of language.  Obviously this was meant as a compliment.

The use of the term “GOP blitzkrieg” by the VP is unfortunate because it shines a bright light once again on the lack of knowledge and understanding of history that has become a hallmark of the lefist statists in America.

Anyone with half a brain knows, this leaves out most Democrats, that the Democrat party of today is much more aligned with the Nazis than is the Republican party.  Hitler ushered in Nazism or National Socialism.  Hitler’s National Socialism was of course a racist form of socialism, but socialism just the same.

Socialism, while not always racist, does, in its promise of equal results, intrinsically need a target group that consists of people who cannot help themselves and cannot achieve equal results without the help of a kind and loving government.  Socialism always tries to appeal to the “little guy” or the “working class”.

The other target of socialists are those whose money the government will take, or “spread the wealth around”, to give to the former target group of less fortunates.  These groups are small business owners and the middle class.

So while socialism may not always be racist in nature as that of Nazi Germany, it is always a force for class warfare as it pits one group against another or one group against many.

Socialistic Nazism pitted the German super Aryan race against all others, particularly against the Jews.  Socialistic Democrats pit the poor, downtrodden, and minorities against the middle class, upper class, and conservatives even if these people happen to also be from a minority group.

Obama and his statist brothers and sisters have done a masterful job of defining conservatives as the enemy of those lower on the socioeconomic scale, meanwhile the statist looks down on the very people it promises to help.

The statist looks down on these people through programs that tell them that they cannot achieve success on their own and the statist is more than happy to make the decisions of life for them with the promise of success in life.  This success never materializes as the promise of utopia turns into a reality of shared poverty.

Programs that involve quotas instead of taking the brightest and best teach minority children that they aren’t as smart as other people.  This is a travesty foisted upon the minority population by the very people that talk the most about “helping” them.

So we see that even though Obama’s socialism is not considered to be racist, it has race at the forefront of its being.  Let’s make no mistake about it, Democrat socialists are as racist as racists come.

The parallels between Nazi socialism and Obama socialism don’t end there.  The other parallel of the Nazi regime to the Obama socialist is that they both have a holocaust.

Nazi Germany under the control of Adolf Hitler slaughtered over six million human beings.  There is no way to say that and make it as gruesome as it was.

Having said that, the Democrat socialist, with the help of some so-called conservatives are fighting to keep the American Holocaust in business.  This holocaust has killed nearly sixty million human beings before they are even born and the vast majority of these being slaughtered are minority babies.

These babies are not slaughtered by doctors for doctors take the Hippocratic oath where they vow to, “Do no harm”.  Doctors would not perform such a miserable deed on a fellow human being.  These are murderous barbarians who take innocent life and tear it limb for limb.

Make no mistake that it is wrong to take an abortionists life also.  The taking of an abortionist’s life gives no chance for this person to repent and accept Christ as Savior.

The act of taking an abortionist’s life decides the fate of the person’s soul and is playing God just as much as the abortionist does.  Such a cowardly act also decides the fate of the abortionist’s murderer because the Bible says, “You shall commit no murder”.

Exit Question: When will the American people realize that the parallels exist, not between conservatism and the Nazi, but the parallels are squarely with the socialistic nature of the Democrat Party and Nazism.

Socialism cannot spring from conservatism as conservatives believe in a government with the limited power drawn up in the Declaration of Independence, Federalist Papers, and the Constitution of America.  These documents, followed by elected officials and the Supreme Court, would keep Americans as freemen until Jesus comes for His own.  If we lose the ability to follow these documents due to tyrannical statism, our country will slip further and further toward fascism and tyranny.

Usually with the left their intolerance is exhibited in the attempt to squelch free speech that does not fit into their agenda through political and judicial means.  The hope of the statist to put an end to talk radio rests in the hands of the FCC and Obama’s Diversity Czar, Mark Lloyd.  The strategy of the left, and Obama in particular, is to eradicate any discussion that does not agree with the socialist agenda of the Democrat party.

Representative Bob Etheridge, Democrat, 2nd district of North Carolina, however, got physical with a student on a sidewalk in Washington.

This student must have been way out of line for this good hearted leftist to grab him by the wrist and then by the nape of the neck.  To make a level headed leftist leaning Democrat Representative angry enough to commit assault, the student must have used some vulgar and profain language in addressing the congressman. This was not the case though.

What made the leftist Democrat mad as an old wet hen?  The representative of the good people of second district of North Carolina was asked, “Do you fully support the Obama agenda.”  The statist of course is above being asked questions by the lowly serfs.  This is a simple question requiring a simple yes or no answer.  This question is not even so pointed as to even be a partisan verbal attack.  It is not out of the question to think that a left leaning student might want to know if this schmuck fully supports the Obama agenda.

Even if this had been a politically charged, partisan missive, an elected official should have the brains and the self control to just answer the question without demanding to know, “Who are you!” and qualifying that question with, “I have a right to know who you are”.  EVERYTHING is a right to the left these days.  Now if a citizen asks an innocuous question of these jerks on the left they demand to know who is asking the question.  Maybe this representative of the people, don’t make me laugh, would rather be asked questions by an illegal alien instead of by an actual citizen of the US?

As can be seen on the video a crime was committed by this so called representative.

Exit Questions:  Will the DC police pick him up and charge him with assault?  Will Nancy Pelosi show she has one inkling of honor left and have this pompous idiot removed from office?

Liberals all across the country are boycotting Arizona.  That’s fine, liberals have been boycotting logic for two hundred years in America and thousands of years world-wide. 

This boycott is a knee jerk reaction that liberals have anytime laws that are in place to protect our borders and preserve our way of life are enforced.  A country without borders ceases to be a country.  A country that does not enforce border restraints during a time of war is unheard of, at least until now. 

 The Obama regime does not stand condemned alone in this area.  As good a champion George Bush was in regard to the war on terror, he was also mushy when it came to enforcing the laws of the land to protect our borders.

Obama and his regime have soared to new heights of idiocy ever since Arizona passed a law that basically makes it possible for the state to do the job of protecting the border since the federal government refuses to do its job.  It is obvious that no one in the Obama regime has read the ten page law before demonizing the state and its governor for the content of the law.

Then Obama invited the President of Mexico to the White House for a steak dinner.  At the get together the Mexican president chastised the state of Arizona for this law when the Mexican laws surrounding illegal immigration are much more stringent than our own and are even prejudiced against legal immigrants who become naturalized citizens of Mexico. 

These immigrant citizens of Mexico cannot vote or own land even though they are naturalized citizens of Mexico.  Also, it is a felony to cross the Mexican border into Mexico illegally.  A second offense can result in a 10 year prison sentence.

It isn’t enough that the president is on an apology tour for America where he is apologizing to every tin horn dictator to which he can bow the knee and head.  Now we have Obama inviting a president from another country to come here to the United States to disparage an illegal immigration law by one of our states. 

How dare this third world president come over to our country and bash the people of our great land.  While this moron, the president of Mexico, attacks Arizona law through lies and smears, a standing ovation was afforded him by the Anti-American Democrats.

The brazenness shown by Obama in offering the Mexican President a platform at the White House to bash one of our governors is so beyond the pale as to reach into new realms of Anti-American posturing even for the Democrats and Obama.

Below is an exerpt from the speech by Mexican President Felipe Calderon.

It is a law that not only ignores a reality that cannot be erased by decree but also introduces a terrible idea using racial profiling as the basis for law enforcement

Exit Question:  Will this president and the Democrats stand with instead of against the American people when it comes to protecting our borders and our way of life against illegal aliens and other threats to our soverignty? 

Anytime Democrats, liberals, and/or statists want to rape the American People, they use children as political shields to protect them from the light of truth.  Meanwhile, they seemingly cannot wait for the next opportunity to make murdering children more easily accessible to anyone who might be inconvenienced by pregnancy or the birth of a child.

The latest piece of (Demo)crap who played the, “It’s for the children”, card is Rep. Phil Hare, D-Ill.  In the course of defending his position on ObamaCare as something he voted for because his heart is for the children, he told the truth about what he thinks of the constitution of the United States.  He admits to not knowing, or even caring, where the constitution gives the government the power to force people to buy ANYTHING.

Rep. Hare does quote a portion of the constitution though when he says, “I believe that it says that we have the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness”.  Nice quote from the constitution Rep. Hare, the only problem is that you quoted from the Declaration of Independence when you were telling your constituents what the constitution said.

He then makes it very clear that he does not care what the constitution says.  We would have never guessed that this dunderhead and the rest of the pieces of (Demo)craps that voted for this bill had no regard for the constitution.  It is obvious in the way these pieces of refuge vote that they don’t give on wit for our countries founding.  This guy is just stupid enough to actually say it. Or maybe he is just that honest.

Before you make that leap of faith in this moron, he also makes a claim to have read the ObamaCare three times which would have taken him about five and a half days.  He will then not answer how many days it took him to read the bill.  Also, he will not answer, as he makes a run for it for it like a little girl, where in the constitution we are required to purchase health insurance.

Also, his heart being pure in this matter of caring so deeply for children as being the overriding force that drove him to vote for ObamaCare is empty rhetoric when this donkey’s voting record is examined.  The information below is found on http://www.ontheissues.org/il/Phil_Hare.htm.  This website offers voting records for all congressmen and senators. 

Abortions always legal, except some partial birth abortions

Indicate which principles you support regarding abortion.
Abortions should always be legal.
Hare adds, “I oppose partial birth abortions unless the life of the mother is at stake.”

Source: 2006 Congressional National Political Awareness Test Nov 7, 2006

Voted YES on expanding research to more embryonic stem cell lines.

Allows federal funding for research that utilizes human embryonic stem cells, regardless of the date on which the stem cells were derived from a human embryo, provided such embryos:

have been donated from in vitro fertilization clinics;
were created for the purposes of fertility treatment;
were in excess of the needs of the individuals seeking such treatment and would otherwise be discarded; and
were donated by such individuals with written informed consent and without any financial or other inducements.

This man has an appalling voting record on children’s issues for someone so concerned with their health.  Of course ObamaCare is not about health, it is about controlling as many aspects of American’s lives as these 3rd World legislators, pieces of (Demo)crap jerks, can possibly control.

Could any district be proud to have this jerk representing them?  Does he REALLY reflect the moral values, mental capacity, and lack of caring of our county’s founding of his constituents?  Hopefully his views and lack of understanding of the constitution do not reflect his constituency and he will be voted out as quickly as possible.  He recently kicked off his re-election campaign, so please people of Illinois, get rid of this guy and vote someone in who gives a flying flip about America.

Of course April 1st is also known as April Fool’s Day.  There is obviously no better day to recognize the wreckage caused to our great country by these irresponsible, short-sighted, childish, and IGNORANT voters.  If you voted for ANY of the Democrats in either house, or if you voted for Obama for President, then this day, April 1st, Democrat Voter Appreciation Day, is for you.

Democrat Voter, you are the true April Fool.  Either you were duped, or fooled, by Obama’s mantra of Hope and Change.  Obama never spelled out what he was hoping for or for what he wanted the American people to hope.  Also, he never said what change or changes he planned to implement.  This did not matter though to the Democrat voter.

Democrat Voter, you are the April Fool, because it didn’t matter to you when concerns were brought to light about Obama’s background.  It didn’t matter to you that his mentor was Saul Alinsky.  It didn’t matter to you that he cares so little about what America stands for that he can call anti-American terrorists his friends.  It was of little concern if any that Obama’s political career was launched in the home of a Pentagon bombing terrorist and his wife who is a cop killing terrorist.

You are the April Fool because when Obama thought he was off mic he told exactly what he was up to when he told Joe the Plumber that he wanted to spread the wealth around.  You wouldn’t listen to logical political talkers and you didn’t listen to the Obama’s own words.  Now you’re shocked that he’s spreading YOUR wealth around?  You’re surprised that he shoved down our throats the biggest power grab this side of Hugo Chavez?  Or maybe you like the health care carnage that Obama has waged on the American people.  If so, you are the biggest fool of all because you are the kind of fool who will give up their God given rights for NOTHING but the satisfaction that some other social group is going to get punished financially.

If you voted for this monstrosity unknowingly, then this day is indeed for you Mr. and Mrs. Democrat voter.  Happy Democrat Voter Appreciation Day.

If you voted for this train wreck of a presidency knowingly, then again you are the worst kind of a fool.  You are the kind of fool that sells liberty cheap.  There is no hope for you, other than maybe you’ll be too sick and too busy waiting in a long line at the DMV trying to get an appointment to see a doctor and won’t be able to vote.

Please enjoy the video below which helps to further explain why we celebrate Democrat Voter Appreciation Day on April 1st.

Happy Democrat Voter Appreciation Day

The sight of Obama and the sound of his voice make me sick.

Our Narcissist in Chief refuses to give his patient, ObamaCare, the same treatment that human patients who cost too much would receive should his bill be passed into law.  ObamaCare should be given an aspirin to alleviate the pain and it should be allowed to RIP.

America doesn’t want to have socialized health care.  America doesn’t want the government to control EVERY aspect of our lives.  Health Care touches EVERYTHING.  Anything that can be deemed, there’s that word again, as having to do with health care, can and will be connected to health care.  If this bill passes we will wish for the days past when we could drive up to a McDonald’s and enjoy some delicious French fries.

America doesn’t want to be a third world, banana republic nation.  We made a mistake and voted a third world president into office, but a good percentage of pro Obama voters are having buyer’s remorse.  I’m having buyer’s remorse and I didn’t vote for the jerk.  Some will say that calling a sitting president is too strong of language to use.  When this bowing, sorry excuse for a leader stops bowing to terrorist leaders and thugs, I might stop calling him a jerk.  When he stops trying to form America into some third world banana republic, I might stop calling him a jerk.  When Obama stops acting like a third world president by pursuing his agenda over the pursuit of what is best for America, then I might stop calling him a jerk.

Rush Limbaugh gets credit for the term, third world president.  Below is an excerpt from The Rush Limbaugh Show that aired March 16th 2010.  I only get credit for seeing the brilliance and profundity in Rush’s description of Obama as a third world president.

RUSH:  And all eyes and all ears are pointed at this show today.  “Tell me, Rush, what is going on?”  Folks, I’ll do my best to explain all of this, but it is devious.  This is one of the biggest domestic threats.  We’ve got a president who is essentially a Third World president…

ObamaCare will make this nation appear much more like a socialistic European nation.  Obama seems to think that this will in some way endear us to the rest of the world.  I thought his presidency was supposed to make everyone love us.

And who cares if the rest of the world loves us anyway?  We feed the rest of the world.  If they don’t love us for that, then to heck with them.  Why should we pander to the rest of the world when they can’t feed themselves, primarily through bad choices they make, such as leaving farm land stagnant to save some stupid specie of animal or because all of the land is owned by the government, which doesn’t farm the land.

If we make our country like the rest of the world, who will feed the rest of the world?  Who will in turn feed us when we cannot feed ourselves?  This jerk of a Narcissist in Chief thinks his slight majority win gave him a mandate to recreate America into a socialized mess of economic, social, and foreign policy decline.  Obama is managing America’s decline and ObamaCare is a large part of this management of our decline.

Republicans, especially those in the Senate, have withstood ObamaCare so far.  The Republicans cannot defeat this bill however, because they do not have the numbers to stop anything.

It is up to the American people to stop this monstrosity of a bill and also to stop the Democrats concerted attack on our Constitution.  Democrats don’t get to do anything they want just because they won an election.  The constitution still stands and it stands against the brand of tyranny that the Dems and ObamaCare have in store for us.

It is fine that Republicans are saying that they are taking names and will make public the deals that Democrats are making in the sale of their “yes” vote for ObamaCare.  It is really all they can do without more numbers.

The American people can and will do more to defeat this horrendous bill.  It isn’t enough to know that Democrats will lose their seats and probably majorities in both houses should this pass.  Entitlements NEVER GO AWAY.  Entitlements NEVER GET REPEALED.  This must be defeated and then we need to kick these vote sellers and vote buyers out of office.  We need to kill this bill and kill it NOW!!!

Let’s Kill The Bill!!!  Please call your congressmen if any might vote for this.  Also call the ones that we need to focus on; this is a national issue so don’t let them brow beat you for calling if you are not a direct voter.

The following information is from Rush’s page.

Keep Trying to Call If It’s Busy (That’s the Point!)
• Dial: 877-762-8762 or 202-224-3121 or 202-225-3121
• Code Red: NRCC’s List of Targeted Congressmen
• Focus: Wilson (D-OH) | Cao (R-LA) | Altmire (D-PA)

Today I started a new project.  The new project was to start an account on Organizing For, really it is against, America and posting my first blog there.  The intention is to see how long these Obamaites will allow my anti-Obama blog entries to stay up on their site.  Another intention of course is to poke these silly Obama fool-aid, not a misspelling,  drinkers with a sharp stick.   Obama followers crack me up and I understand their delicate, tightly wound psyche must be handled with kid gloves.  I’ll try my best to not drive them over the edge of the cliff to which they are teetering so closely.  I’m expecting to see much tolerance from the oh, so tolerant left.

Below is the content of my first blog post on the Organizing For America site.  Please enjoy.

The Bottom Line Concerning Health Care

By Marty Griffith – Mar 1st, 2010 at 4:49 pm EST

A lot has been said about health care during this nearly yearlong debate.  We have heard many anecdotes about people that have not received adequate health care and stories of some who have received no health care.  Two things that statists have never answered for us though are:

1.)  Where in the constitution is the government given the power to take over our individual health care decisions?

2.)  How in the world are we going to pay for this massive extension of Medicare and Medicaid?

If an answer cannot be given to question #1, then question #2 really does not need an answer.  Government should NOT be in the business of taking for itself power that it grabs from the people.  More importantly, the government should NEVER take for itself powers that the constitution does not grant to it.  Power grabs outside of the constitution give the government illegitimate power.

For the sake of argument, let’s move on to question two even though the power grab by the government would be unconstitutional.

Medicare and Medicaid are both highly responsible for the financial ruins we find our nation getting closer to every day.   Obamacare would expand Medicare to cover the 14,000,000 people who are uninsured in the country, and wish to have insurance.  So Obama and the Democrats are going to mortgage or children’s and grandchildren’s futures by expanding an entitlement program that is a disaster financially for America’s taxpayers.

Exit Question:  Do we have the fortitude and moral character to say “No” to this governmental power grab and put what is right ahead of anecdotal fairy tales?

The link to the original blog entry is http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/MartyGriffith/gGGg49

It was only a matter of time until the first instance would come about where the government’s ownership of GM and Chrysler would drive the Obama administration to try to kill off competition.  Bill Burton, White House spokesman, insisted that the government’s majority ownership of GM and part ownership of Chrysler, “would not have any impact on this administration’s commitment to making sure that Americans are kept safe on our roads.”  So straight from the White House there is no conflict of interest here.  Give me a major break!

Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood was testifying in front of a House Appropriations subcommittee when he decided to advise Toyota drivers on what to do.

“My advice is, if anybody owns one of these vehicles, stop driving it,” he said at the 10 a.m. hearing. “Take it to a Toyota dealer because they believe they have a fix for it.”

This of course caused bedlam in Toyota dealerships across the country as drivers of Toyotas stopped driving them and took them into dealerships who will not have the parts to begin making fixes until next week.  Toyota was scheduling to fix this accelerator problem through mail outs to 2.3 million Toyota owners.  They are not prepared to deal with them all at once as the Transportation Secretary seemed to suggest.  Millions clamoring to their dealership only to find out that the parts were not in and also to find long lines, left Toyota dealerships overwhelmed and customers totally dissatisfied with Toyota and skeptical about the company’s integrity in this matter.

Secretary LaHood did offer a clarification of his statement before the subcommittee by saying, “What I meant to say, what I thought I said, was if you own one of these cars, take it to the dealer,” he said. “If you’re in doubt, take it to the dealership today and have them look at it and have them fix it”.

So he cleared up his previous statement by saying basically the same thing.  “If you own one of these cars, take it to the dealer”.  He left off the part about stop driving it, but he left the dealerships in the same bad position of having drivers come in without being scheduled for the fix, and without parts for the fix.  People tend to trust the government.  Why they do, I can not figure out.

This moron obviously should not be in a position of power.  Besides the grief he caused to the general public, he also caused this company’s stock to plummet.  Is he just an idiot or does he have an axe to grind with Toyota because they dare to compete with GM, Government Motors?  Either way, the result is the same.  The statist never sees wrong done by himself and never examines his own motives.  Through contempt of free enterprise, stupidity, or just ineptness this lunkhead  of a transportation secretary caused undo stress for millions.

Did he call Toyota to ask what their plan is for this recall?  Maybe he felt it was not his place as a competitor, since Obama is basically the CEO of GM, and a direct competitor of Toyota.  Maybe he acted maliciously since his government is a direct competitor of Toyota?  I don’t know his motives, but I do know that the results of a government owned corporation or industry is an idea that only statists would think is a good one.  Obama said that he doesn’t want to be in the automobile industry, but he is in it.  Since when did a bailout mean that the government takes over an industry?  That isn’t a bailout, it is a buy out and GM was not even for sale.

Toyota had a plan in place to recall and fix these automobiles.  They were already acting in good faith with regard to owning up to the problem, finding out the cause and putting a plan and schedule in place to repair the affected vehicles.  The statist cannot wait to impose his power on corporations just to show who is really in charge.

Exit Question:  Are we going to throw out the Democrats in 2010 so that we can send a message to the Marxist, statists that enough is enough and we want, no, we demand to have our country back???