Food For Thought

Today I started a new project.  The new project was to start an account on Organizing For, really it is against, America and posting my first blog there.  The intention is to see how long these Obamaites will allow my anti-Obama blog entries to stay up on their site.  Another intention of course is to poke these silly Obama fool-aid, not a misspelling,  drinkers with a sharp stick.   Obama followers crack me up and I understand their delicate, tightly wound psyche must be handled with kid gloves.  I’ll try my best to not drive them over the edge of the cliff to which they are teetering so closely.  I’m expecting to see much tolerance from the oh, so tolerant left.

Below is the content of my first blog post on the Organizing For America site.  Please enjoy.

The Bottom Line Concerning Health Care

By Marty Griffith – Mar 1st, 2010 at 4:49 pm EST

A lot has been said about health care during this nearly yearlong debate.  We have heard many anecdotes about people that have not received adequate health care and stories of some who have received no health care.  Two things that statists have never answered for us though are:

1.)  Where in the constitution is the government given the power to take over our individual health care decisions?

2.)  How in the world are we going to pay for this massive extension of Medicare and Medicaid?

If an answer cannot be given to question #1, then question #2 really does not need an answer.  Government should NOT be in the business of taking for itself power that it grabs from the people.  More importantly, the government should NEVER take for itself powers that the constitution does not grant to it.  Power grabs outside of the constitution give the government illegitimate power.

For the sake of argument, let’s move on to question two even though the power grab by the government would be unconstitutional.

Medicare and Medicaid are both highly responsible for the financial ruins we find our nation getting closer to every day.   Obamacare would expand Medicare to cover the 14,000,000 people who are uninsured in the country, and wish to have insurance.  So Obama and the Democrats are going to mortgage or children’s and grandchildren’s futures by expanding an entitlement program that is a disaster financially for America’s taxpayers.

Exit Question:  Do we have the fortitude and moral character to say “No” to this governmental power grab and put what is right ahead of anecdotal fairy tales?

The link to the original blog entry is http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/MartyGriffith/gGGg49

At the Obamacare summit with the Republicans, Obama related an anecdote about his personal experience with car insurance.

His personal story is a LIE!  How do I know it’s a lie?  The way he says that liability insurance works, is not the way it works at all.  This moron cannot even look into the way insurance works in order to make his lie believable.  How can he NOT know the way that insurance works in the first place?  Again, I’m still looking for one thing this guy KNOWS how to do well. 

In the lie, Obama is rear ended, (insert liberal joke here), and his insurance won’t pay because he only has liability insurance.  Now unless you’re drinking the same fool aide as Obama, you know that if an accident is not your fault, the other person’s insurance pays for your car to be repaired. 

Your car gets repaired even if the other person only has liability insurance.  Now if the person at fault does not have insurance, you might have to go to small claims court to get your money to pay for your car repairs.

Exit Question:  Is this the change you nitwit liberals voted for?  At least your last choice for president, Slick Willy, could make his lies slightly credible.

Frank Marshall Davis was important enough to Barrack Obama that he included a few paragraphs about “Frank” in his book, “Dreams From My Father”.  Jerome Corsi also found that he evidently sold drugs in the teenage Obama’s presence, please see http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=79467. You can Google this man’s name and find that he is a Marxist Communist.  Obama’s grandfather introduced his grandson to the communist radical.

Obama was a Saul Alinsky disciple in his early 20s. This is also someone whose name can be Googled and you will find him to be a Marxist communist.

Obama attended a church for 20 years which espouses black liberation theology, which is anti white, anti Jew, and Marxist in nature.

If Obama is not a Marxist communist, he has spent his whole teenage and adult life trying to look like one.

It was only a matter of time until the first instance would come about where the government’s ownership of GM and Chrysler would drive the Obama administration to try to kill off competition.  Bill Burton, White House spokesman, insisted that the government’s majority ownership of GM and part ownership of Chrysler, “would not have any impact on this administration’s commitment to making sure that Americans are kept safe on our roads.”  So straight from the White House there is no conflict of interest here.  Give me a major break!

Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood was testifying in front of a House Appropriations subcommittee when he decided to advise Toyota drivers on what to do.

“My advice is, if anybody owns one of these vehicles, stop driving it,” he said at the 10 a.m. hearing. “Take it to a Toyota dealer because they believe they have a fix for it.”

This of course caused bedlam in Toyota dealerships across the country as drivers of Toyotas stopped driving them and took them into dealerships who will not have the parts to begin making fixes until next week.  Toyota was scheduling to fix this accelerator problem through mail outs to 2.3 million Toyota owners.  They are not prepared to deal with them all at once as the Transportation Secretary seemed to suggest.  Millions clamoring to their dealership only to find out that the parts were not in and also to find long lines, left Toyota dealerships overwhelmed and customers totally dissatisfied with Toyota and skeptical about the company’s integrity in this matter.

Secretary LaHood did offer a clarification of his statement before the subcommittee by saying, “What I meant to say, what I thought I said, was if you own one of these cars, take it to the dealer,” he said. “If you’re in doubt, take it to the dealership today and have them look at it and have them fix it”.

So he cleared up his previous statement by saying basically the same thing.  “If you own one of these cars, take it to the dealer”.  He left off the part about stop driving it, but he left the dealerships in the same bad position of having drivers come in without being scheduled for the fix, and without parts for the fix.  People tend to trust the government.  Why they do, I can not figure out.

This moron obviously should not be in a position of power.  Besides the grief he caused to the general public, he also caused this company’s stock to plummet.  Is he just an idiot or does he have an axe to grind with Toyota because they dare to compete with GM, Government Motors?  Either way, the result is the same.  The statist never sees wrong done by himself and never examines his own motives.  Through contempt of free enterprise, stupidity, or just ineptness this lunkhead  of a transportation secretary caused undo stress for millions.

Did he call Toyota to ask what their plan is for this recall?  Maybe he felt it was not his place as a competitor, since Obama is basically the CEO of GM, and a direct competitor of Toyota.  Maybe he acted maliciously since his government is a direct competitor of Toyota?  I don’t know his motives, but I do know that the results of a government owned corporation or industry is an idea that only statists would think is a good one.  Obama said that he doesn’t want to be in the automobile industry, but he is in it.  Since when did a bailout mean that the government takes over an industry?  That isn’t a bailout, it is a buy out and GM was not even for sale.

Toyota had a plan in place to recall and fix these automobiles.  They were already acting in good faith with regard to owning up to the problem, finding out the cause and putting a plan and schedule in place to repair the affected vehicles.  The statist cannot wait to impose his power on corporations just to show who is really in charge.

Exit Question:  Are we going to throw out the Democrats in 2010 so that we can send a message to the Marxist, statists that enough is enough and we want, no, we demand to have our country back???

I really do want to write a positive blog entry about the President of the United States.  I have such respect for this position and realize that it is a position of honor.  My guess though, is that I will agree with nothing from this office until the current occupant has been thrown out on his rear by the voters.  One thing I refuse to do is to be agreeable just to show that I can agree with him.  Some conservatives seem to think that the high ground is to find things that we agree with this president on and trumpet those to show that we aren’t like the democrats in their hatred of Bush.

As a Christian who is a conservative, I don’t hate Mr. Obama.  I do hate his ideology, policies, and the way he wants to remake America into a community that he can organize ala Saul Alinsky.  My hope is that Mr. Obama will repent of his attack on the American citizen as an individual and will respect our constitution which acknowledges that God has given individuals rights that only tyrants take away.  I do not hate Mr. Obama for this takeover of individual rights, but I hate his tyrannical ways.  As president, Mr. Obama needs to respect the vow he made at his inauguration and defend the constitution of the United States that he is dismantling piece by piece through his power grab policies.

Anyone with morals finds the president’s propensity to lie disturbing at best and evil at worst.  This man chooses to lie when there is seemingly no benefit to do so.  He continuously lies about his record over the past year as president and blames it all on Bush anyway.  Obama has said that stimulus brought us out of the recession, but that Bush did nothing to end or lessen the effects of the recession.  It was, however, Bush who was president when the stimulus was signed and it was Bush’s pen that signed it.  Mr. Obama cannot have it both ways.  The stimulus didn’t stimulate the economy anyway, but only stimulated government.  Not much to fight over when it means taking credit for a boondoggle.

Obviously, if the president didn’t attend the prayer breakfast this would have been an issue with Christians, including me.  In attending though, and in speaking, did he have to make a prayer breakfast into at best an ecumenical event and at worse a pagan, secular event.  Why not say a few nice sentiments and sit down?  Why talk for 15 plus minutes about a subject he knows so little about?  The speech is line upon line of fabrications, misquotes, and lies.  Yes, the president even lies at prayer breakfasts. 

The first lie is in the history that the president gave concerning the prayer breakfast.  The president felt that this history was important, and evidently important enough to lie about it.  The president’s remarks cast the early days of this prayer breakfast as an ecumenical assembly of people that believed there are many roads to god.  The truth is that this prayer breakfast was started by a Norwegian immigrant who traveled, preaching to the poor and battling the influence of socialists.  This was an evangelical Christian preacher, not some anything you choose to believe is fine, kind of fellow.  Again, the president felt this perverted history lesson important as he said, "I raise this history because far too often, we have seen faith wielded as a tool to divide us from one another”.  The president obviously doesn’t realize that his own faith, even in this speech he claims to be a Christian, divides people by its very nature.  Jesus Himself said, “Think not that I came to send peace on the earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. For I came to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law” Matthew 10:34-35.  If the president is a Christian, he does not understand the faith once and for all delivered, he is lying to make Christianity more palatable to unbelievers, or he is lying about being a Christian altogether.  I leave it to you, dear reader, to decide.

A few sentences later the president says something else that is absurd that makes one wonder of his naivety or truthfulness.  Surely someone of any intellect could not really believe what he said.  “let us remember that there is in religion whose central tenet is hate. There is no God who condones taking the life of an innocent human being. This much we know.”  No religion has as a central tenet of hate?  Where has this moron been since 9/11?  Does he really believe this or his he lying in order to make nice with Islamo Nazis?  In this case I really hope he’s lying and isn’t stupid enough to believe the load of Barbara Streisand he’s shoveling.  And you libs thought George W. Bush was dumb?  A fire hydrant could hold a better discussion on religion than this idiot.  Also, if “there is no God who condones taking the life of an innocent human being”, then why does the president?  Is he better than God Almighty?

Now, I’m not going to do a point by point critique of this monstrosity of a speech.  I’ll spare you and me that bit of torture. 

Also in the speech were some shoddy Biblical references.  Obama said that Jesus told us to “Love thy neighbor as thyself”.  This is actually found in Leviticus 19:18 and is part of the Old Law.  Jesus made reference to this law in Mark 12:31 when He was asked by a scribe to name the first or most important commandment.  In answering Jesus went back to Levitical law, He wrote it after all, and said, “The first of all the commandments is, Hear, O Israel; The Lord our God is one Lord: And thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind, and with all thy strength: this is the first commandment. And the second is like, namely this, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. There is none other commandment greater than these”.  You would think at a prayer breakfast the president would come better prepared with statements concerning the Bible, since he is after all a Christian.

The last piece I will mention from the speech is this, “"Surely you can question my policies without questioning my faith – or, for that matter, my citizenship”.  Mr. President with all due respect your policies are what drive the questions concerning your faith.  Your policies do not stack up with the tenets of faith that Christians hold.  Your policies cause us to wonder why you would consider yourself to be a Christian.  Personally I think you do it for political gain.  You sat under the preaching of an anti-Semite, America hating, and America cursing pastor for 20 years.  This makes us wonder as to your faith.  Your statement on June 28, 2006 also makes people wonder about your faith.  The following excerpt is from that speech.  "And even if we did have only Christians in our midst, if we expelled every non-Christian from the United States of America, whose Christianity would we teach in the schools? Would we go with James Dobson’s, or Al Sharpton’s? Which passages of Scripture should guide our public policy? Should we go with Leviticus, which suggests slavery is ok and that eating shellfish is abomination? How about Deuteronomy, which suggests stoning your child if he strays from the faith? Or should we just stick to the Sermon on the Mount – a passage that is so radical that it’s doubtful that our own Defense Department would survive its application? So before we get carried away, let’s read our bibles. Folks haven’t been reading their bibles."  With this childish attack on the Bible, we are to believe that you are Christian sir?  I argue that it is your own actions, policies, and statements that raise concern about your faith, so don’t blame us.  You are good at the blame game though. 

Exit question for Obama:  Maybe your lack of knowledge on Biblical themes is George W. Bush’s fault too?

President Obummer, (sorry I still cannot say the man’s name attached to the word president), was addressing a town hall meeting in Nashua, New Hampshire where he discussed the need to spend less during a tough economic time.  Mr. President I am sick and tired of being lectured by a narcissistic, lying psychopath like you and the socialistic, Marxist hacks that you surround yourself with.  We should spend less because the economy is bad?  What about you spending less of our money?  What about you not stealing our money before we even get it from our employers?

The following quote is from the Narcissist in Chief’s dribble that was said at the town hall meeting, “When times are tough, you tighten your belts.   You don’t go buying a boat when you can barely pay your mortgage. You don’t blow a bunch of cash on Vegas when you’re trying to save for college”.

As usual, this moron has everything backwards.  People spending money will spur the economy.  The government stealing our money and putting it down all of their rat holes takes more money out of circulation from the private sector will bring any economy to a halt.  Tightening the belts, to our Spender in Chief is for the American people, meanwhile the government spends OUR money before we have even had a chance to earn it.  We haven’t even worked for the money and the government hasn’t had a chance to get their grubby hands on it, and it is already spent.  This administration is a train wreck, but this one is easy to look away from unlike most train wrecks.  This jerk keeps telling us that he inherited the debt, but he has quadrupled the debt that he inherited.

Obummer is trying to wreck our economy to bring on more government control.  That is the only explanation that makes sense, unless he is truly too stupid to tie his own shoes and has to have Michelle my bell wipe the snot from his nose.  His advice is for people to stop spending, which alone can put a nation into an economic decline or recession.  On top of that he is going to raise taxes on us ALL, and he is going to double the national debt with his his new budget.  If an enemy country or were doing this to us, we would be at war.  In reality we are at war against liberalism, socialism, and Marxism.  We are at war because we are under attack by both houses of congress and the White House. 

These country wreckers are unencumbered by Republicans because there aren’t enough of them to stop any of this.  The only thing halting this agenda to bring the American people to our knees are the tea parties and people letting these bumbling idiot politicians know that if they vote for ObamaCare and Cap and Trade, they will be voted out in 2010 or 2012.

“You never let a serious crisis go to waste. And what I mean by that it’s an opportunity to do things you think you could not do before.”  The words of Rham “F–ing Retarded” Emanuel.  These Marxist Stalinists are creating a deeper recession and are on their way to destroying the economy of our children and grandchildren.  Why would they do this?  They are creating a crisis to take over more of our freedom.  When the government takes your dollars, they are taking your property.  This crisis will mean the government will be taking more of our property and that of our children and grandchildren.  When the government takes a portion of your property in taxes, it also keeps you from purchasing more property.  Property is anything you can obtain through the fruits of your labor.

Exit Question:  Do we have the resolve to keep the pressure on the statists to make them afraid of coming elections?

Yes, the Democrats have come up with the perfect solution to getting out of a recession.  Never mind that more debt has never and will never get a person, family, organization, corporation, or Nation out of a recession.  We wouldn’t want to wake these numbskulls from the delusions in which Democrats abide while living in their alternative reality.  Mathematics show that thinking that this country just needs more debt in order to end the recession to be the thinking of lunatics.  Common sense shows that thinking that this country just needs more debt in order to end the recession to be the thinking of lunatics.  Even history shows that thinking that this country just needs more debt in order to end the recession to be the thinking of lunatics.

So what lunatic nut job is the latest that is calling for more government spending which will lead to an increase in national debt?  To name one would not be entirely fare.  The first lunatic nut job that comes to mind is the president of the United Sates.  As reported at examiner.com, President Obummer has said that the nation needs to continue to “spend our way out of this recession”.  He also said, “I’m still committed to halving the deficit we inherited by the end of my first term — cutting it in half.”  This proves the point so well that figures don’t lie but liars can figure.  Obummer has so far more than doubled the debt that he “inherited” from Bush.  Remember it is law makers, both houses of congress, that actually spend money and Obummer was a senator during Bush’s last term as President.  I don’t recall a “nay” vote at all from Obummer concerning any spending bills while he was a senator.  Obummer really didn’t inherit the national debt, but instead he contributed to it.  What’s even worse is that this is his only REAL action as a no-account senator from Illinois.  The feckless president of the United States isn’t the nut job to which I am referring to here, though nut job he is nonetheless.

Am I referring to the whole of the Democrat party as a nut job of many?  Well, this is also fitting as the Democrats are poised to increase the national debt to 14.3 TRILLION dollars and will surely increase spending and taxation in order not to waste this excess wiggle room in the debt ceiling.  Of course we can expect these incompetent boobs to toe the party line and talking points of, “this is the debt we inherited from Bush”.  Never mind they have quadrupled the debt that they did “inherit” from Bush.  By the way, Democrat nut jobs, you VOTED FOR ALL OF THE SPENDING while Bush was president.  You inherited nothing in the way of spending and national debt that you didn’t vote for, including the Iraq and Afghanistan wars.  You nut jobs cannot keep complaining about Bush for things you had a hand in causing, if not the upper hand.  Unless, of course, by doing this, you Democrats wish to keep and improve upon your standing as nut jobs.  So far, so good Democrats, keep up the lunacy.

The person to whom I refer as a nut job today is House majority Whip, James Clyburn.  Mr. Clyburn is a Democrat representative from South Carolina.  First, I have a question for the good people of South Carolina.  The question is, does this nitwit really represent the people of South Carolina?  Do you really share this man’s incompetence and his hatred of the truth and common sense?  If you, the good people of South Carolina do not share in this, then why is this dunderhead representing you?  This is what that brainiac of a representative said concerning the recession and the national debt, “We’ve got to spend our way out of this recession, and I think most economists know that.”  Most economists know that we’ve got to spend our way of this recession?  Really?  Are we talking economists that are similar in economics as to the “scientists” that make up the “science” of global warming?  Has Clyburn spoken to most economists, or just the one(s) that agree with his uneducated ascertain of the recession situation?

Spending by the American people WILL bring an end to the recession.  The way to bring this about is less government spending, less taxation on ALL of us, including the rich and corporations.  Lower taxes will allow corporations to hire more people, who the government can tax.  Lower taxes will allow corporations to spend more money, which will allow smaller companies that provide products and services to large corporations to be able to employ more people, who the government can tax.  Lowering taxes on the general population, those that actually pay taxes, will allow the general public to buy and consume more products and services, thus allowing companies to employ more people, who the government can tax.  JFK and the great Ronald Reagan both used this model or trickledown economics and proved that lowering taxes actually brings in more revenue because it puts more people on the tax rolls and when corporations aren’t being punished for making money, they tend to be more forthcoming with what they are making by spending more of it here in the United States.

More spending by Uncle Sam and increased taxation on the American people will just drive us further into recession and if this isn’t righted quickly we will find ourselves in the Not So Great Depression of 2010.  Let’s not give our children a nice story to tell of how we survived the Depression of 2010, but let’s give them a more important lesson of how we beat back the soft tyranny of the left.  Let’s tell them a story, not of rationing coffee, gasoline, and other products, but one of victory over the tyrants that wish to drive us into a deep recession or a deeper depression.

Exit Question:  Have we had enough of these liberal nut jobs that we will storm the polling places in 2010 and vote that they ALL get new jobs?

Our President isn’t just any old fool, he’s the type of fool that can disregard a mountainous pile of emails being sent between scientists that show without a shadow of a doubt that man-made global warming is and always has been a fairy tale and a hoax.  Personally I believe our Community Organizer in Chief knows climate change to be a hoax, but also knows that this is the best chance, outside of healthcare, to take freedom from individuals and give more power to the government.  What makes him a fool, and not just any fool, but a dangerous fool is that he seems not to worry at all about this mountain of email evidence that show the scientists and Obummer to be frauds. 

Once again, the president has been caught with his pants down, not in the Clinton manner, but figuratively.  He is shown by his own words to be a liar.  To make the statements that he made in the speech concerning man-made climate change following the light that has been shown on these earth in the lurch people is just ludicrous.  Here’s what the president said about global warming in his State of Obama speech last night, “I know that there are those that disagree with the overwhelming scientific evidence on climate change”.  Before that statement, the president said, “it means passing a comprehensive energy and climate bill with incentives that will finally make clean energy the profitable kind of energy in America”.

Mr. President, “clean” energy isn’t the profitable kind of energy because people are not buying it, and you know this.  That is why this climate bill will have “incentives” that will force people to purchase “clean” energy from sources that before had no customers or very few.  The fact is this president hates the free market.  He loathes capitalism as the socialist loathes free speech.  Is the president a socialist?  No, he is not a socialist.  I’m not one to throw around names at people unless the name fits the person.  Our president is a Marxist, plain and simple.  The free market has served us well for over 200 years, but this community activist that never earned a real dollar in his life, knows of a better way.  Our totally ineffective  president wants to spread the wealth around.  Well he’s been spreading the manure around pretty thick for a year while in office.  Any accomplishments?  He swatted a fly on TV.  Put that in your history books you liberal mamby pamby pointy heads.

Obummer also mentioned the “overwhelming scientific evidence on climate change”.  Any chowder head knows that the scientists that push the so called “evidence” of man-made global warming have reached their conclusions by way of consensus, not through science.  Now for even the chowder head this means that the conclusion is flawed as it is based on what these scientists wanted to find.  The scientists ARE in agreement on what they wished to find.  Plus we have the emails that show that these scientists made up data and hid data to come up with the conclusion of their consensus.  Only a fool, and a dangerous fool at that, would keep pressing for laws that restrict the types of energy that Americans want to purchase and use.  In Obummer we have just such a dangerous fool.  The video below shows the fallacy of the man-made global warming, flat earther.

Exit Question:  Will the people stand up for the free market and individual property as we stood against and continue to stand against Obamacare?

It is a sad thing to see a person lose his or her mind, and it is even more sad to see a whole group of people, the Democrat Party in this case, lose what little of their minds they had left.  How could people numbering in the millions lose their minds all at once?  Could a major catastrophe cause so many people to all lose the last bit of sanity they had shared between all of them?  They did, of course watch as the seat in the senate so long held by The Swimmer, go to a Republican.  And not just any Republican.  This Republican was unheard of three weeks before the election.  Martha Coakley, the Democrats thought, would take her rightful spot in Ted Kennedy’s seat and Obamacare would be right on schedule.  This Republican had no shot at winning an election in liberal Massachusetts, where he was running as a Reagan conservative.

Then the two candidates had a debate and this is when Republicans around the country started believing that Scott Brown could win this election and put the final nail in the coffin of Obamacare.  The defining moment of this campaign came during the debate when David Rodham Gergen asked Brown how he would feel should he take over “the Kennedy seat” in the senate.  Brown replied, "With all due respect, this isn’t the Kennedy seat. It’s the people’s seat”.  This comment was all over the conservative news and political media.  A great line in a debate that probably cost Coakley the election.  The conservative blogosphere lit up the social media sites raising money for Scott Brown’s campaign.  The last week of the campaign donations were over one million dollars every day.

Suddenly the polling data started to tighten up and this previously unheard of state senator was in the race of his life.  Scared that the super majority, filibuster proof senate was about to be lost, Obama himself road in on a white steed to save the day.  Two things sealed the fate of the Democrat in this race, at least things that the Democrats could control.  The first was the debate.  When you are up by 25 or 30 points you have nothing to gain by debating.  If it is a written or unwritten rule to have at least one debate, Coakley is a Democrat which means she is not held by laws, much less rules.  Second, Obama came to campaign for her.  The reason Coakley was in trouble in this campaign in the first place was because Obama will not listen to the American people when it comes to healthcare.  We do not want a sixth of our economy taken over by the government.  We do not want some bureaucrat or a panel of bureaucrats, a death panel, in Washington or anywhere else telling us when it’s OK to live and when we should just take some pain pills and call the mortician in the morning.  Obama is seen for who he is, a Marxist socialist hack who is hoping to change the United States into a banana republic like those his buddies Chavez and Castro run.

Because of these things, Scott Brown is the new senator of Massachusetts and the Democrats are even more out of their minds than usual.  All at once Democrats have lost the last shred of sanity they had.  Still, how is it possible that a group of people lose their minds all at the same time?  It is the cult of personality and their cult leader is a president who is a failure.  Obama is a community activist who knows how to rabel rouse but has never lead anything or anyone.  This has not changed even though he holds the largest leadership role in the world as President of the United States.  He is our Community Organizer in Chief.  He knows how to agitate but did not learn how to lead from Saul Alinsky.   He has agitated the American people until we are mad as wet hens and we are demanding that he cut out this giant power grab for the government of our freedoms. 

Now that the Democrats and Obama have lost in Massachusetts they have become unhinged altogether.  Until now they were hanging by one hinge, but that hinge is off the door and the padded cell is in sight.  You would guess that when a party that holds the presidency goes through tough times, that the President will share wisdom and this will bring comfort to the masses.  This isn’t happening with Obama.  No this cult of personality leader showed that he is as shaken and out of his mind as the rest of the Democrat cult members.  Obama didn’t have wise words to share with his subordinate cultists.  He did try to conjure up words of comfort though in telling his worshippers that they were not to blame and of course The One could never be  blamed.  The fault, Obama would say rests with…George Bush.  Yes, anger at George Bush had caused people to vote for a Republican.  Here’s what Obama said.  “Here’s my assessment of not just the vote in Massachusetts but the mood around the country: The same thing that swept Scott Brown into office swept me into office.  People are angry and they are frustrated. Not just because of what’s happened in the last year or two years but what’s happened over the last eight years.”

So we are not angry over Obama and the elders of the cult trying to push Obamacare down our throats.  We are actually angry at George Bush and therefore we will vote for candidates that are more like George Bush.  These people live in an alternate reality of make believe in which they can do no wrong even when they are so wrong that they lose a senate seat in the liberal of all liberal states, Massachusetts.  But in refusing to accept blame, they attempt to transfer guilt to a president who never would have accepted their hair-brain policies?  With this level of nuttery in the Democrat cult of personality, I would suggest to the leaders of the socialistic, Marxist movement to run and hide if they see people dressed in white, carrying butterfly nets.

Exit Question:  Will the Democrats get psychological help or will they continue drinking the Obama Kool-Aid and dive deeper into their psychosis of alternate reality?

Much has been made of comparisons involving the Obummer administration’s attempted take over of seemingly every part of our lives, to Nazi socialism.  Of course with this comparison come the knee jerk reaction of the statist claiming that conservatives want to paint poor feckless Barry as a genocidal maniac.  No conservative that I have heard or read has made any connection between the holocaust and the worst president in our history.  For libs, Dems, statists, and progressives I’ll tell you to whom I refer and it is none other than Barrack Hussein Obummer. 

I have seen pictures that depict Obummer with a little mustache and wearing a hat with a swastika on the front.  I even pondered using such a picture in my blog, “What Does Tyranny Look Like?”, but reconsidered after making the assessment that this was too over the top, even for me.  But is it really that far fetched to tie Obummer and the rest of the Dems for that matter to genocide?  Obummer vowed not to sign a healthcare bill that did not include tax-payer money to pay for abortions.  While a state senator in Illinois Obummer voted against bills that would make partial birth abortions illegal in that state.  Let me make myself perfectly clear.  This IS a modern day holocaust.  From time to time people will wonder out loud about whether a holocaust like Nazi Germany could happen here in the United States.  Could the American people sit idly by while millions of people are murdered just because they are undesirable?  In one word that is ABORTION and abortion IS an American holocaust.

I have mentioned partial birth abortion.  In this type of abortion the entire body of the baby, except the head, is delivered by the abortionist.  Abortions, by the way are not performed by doctors.  Doctors take the Hippocratic Oath during which they vow “to do no harm”.  Therefore I will call these monsters abortionists and not doctors because if they were doctors they would do no harm.  Once the body is delivered, except for the head, the abortionist jams scissors into the baby’s skull and opens the scissors to enlarge the hole in the skull.  After the scissors are removed, a suction catheter is inserted to suck the child’s brains out.  The dead baby is then removed.

No, we don’t have concentration camps, we have wombs.  We don’t have gas chambers we have murder mills we call abortion clinics.  We don’t have trenches where we put the bodies of the murdered, we discard of the bodies of babies in the garbage.  We don’t have a Hitler like figure in charge of the operation, we have the Supreme Court, Democrat Party, Planned Parenthood, and President Obummer.

We are squeamish over some pictures of Obummer that depict him to look like Hitler.  Shouldn’t we be more squeamish about the 49,000,000 babies who have been murdered in America’s holocaust?  Hitler murdered about 6,000,000 Jews and as horrific as this is, the abortionist’s murder mills have killed 43,000,000 more people then did Hitler.  Joseph Stalin it is calculated, killed about 60,000,000 people.

Exit Question:  Maybe it would be more fitting to depict Obummer and the rest of the dems as Stalin instead of Hitler?