In his Interview with Brian Williams, Imam Obama is asked about whether he is troubled or not about poll numbers that show an increasing number of Americans believe he is a Muslim and not an American citizen.  Obama answers this by saying that,

I can’t spend all my time with my birth certificate plastered on my forehead.

With all due respect Imam Obama, even if you are a citizen of the US, you are still a lying, socialist, pinko communist, who will be rendered useless by the conservative landslide at the polls in 2010. You will also be voted out in 2012. You will be a neutered lame duck and rendered useless  your last two years in office, you Jerk!!!

You promised transparency and openness while you campaigned for the presidency, meanwhile you can’t even be honest about your birth certificate.  Again, my beef with you isn’t about whether you are a citizen or not.  My problem with you rests on the fact that you are a lying socialist, terrorist sympathizer, and appeaser.

The American people, even the fools that voted for you, are realizing what you are doing to our society in the name of personal and government power.  The American people know who is responsible and we are going to vote your cronies out of office at the end of this year, and we’re going to vote your vacationing butt out of office in 2012.

Exit Observation:  We’re taking names, we’re waiting now for the judgment day.  Many liberals will be judged as inept to serve and will be booted out of office and replaced with American patriots who will do what is right for the people and this great nation.  We will restore this nation to its constitutional roots.

Deputy White House press secretary Bill Burton, when asked about a poll showing that the number of Americans who think the president is a Muslim is going up said,

And so the President is obviously a — is Christian.  He prays every day.  He communicates with his religious advisor every single day.  There’s a group of pastors that he takes counsel from on a regular basis.  And his faith is very important to him, but it’s not something that is a topic of conversation every single day.

So according to secretary Burton, the president is a Christian because he prays every day, talks with his religious advisor every single day, and takes counsel from a group of pastors regularly.  However, though his faith is important to him, he doesn’t talk about his faith every single day.  So, he talks to his religious advisor every single day, but his faith is not something he talks about every single day.  What on God’s green earth are he and his RELIGIOUS advisor talking about if it is never, apparently, about his FAITH!!!

I realize these are not the president’s words, but they are the words of his Deputy White House press secretary.  With this brouhaha surrounding the mosque at ground zero and the speculation surrounding Obama’s religious beliefs, you have to think these words were chosen and not just thought up completely off the cuff.

I would guess that Obama’s religious advisor was at least consulted about what to say as well as Obama himself.  The best these morons, Obama’s religious advisor is Jim Wallis, then you have Obama and secretary Burton, could come up with is that Obama is a Christian because he prays daily, talks about Marxist philosophy with Wallis Daily, takes counsel from a group of pastors, and doesn’t like to talk about his faith every single day.  That is what a Christian is?  I was going to go back and take out the word “morons”, but that describes these three blind mice to a T.

Religiously, what do we know about Barrack Husein Obama?  We know that he was born Muslim.  We know that Muslims claim him as one of them.  We know that he says that he is a Christian.  We know that he sat and listened to liberation theology, Marxism dressed up in church clothes, for 20 years being spewed from an America hating, racist named Jeremiah Wright.

His religious advisor since becoming president is another Marxist theologian named Jim Wallis.  So another socialist dressed in Sunday go to meeting clothes is advising the president.  When asked,

Are you then calling for the redistribution of wealth in society?

Wallis responded,

That’s what the Gospel is all about.

So Jesus came to die on the cross so that money could be transferred from the haves to the have nots?  This is a blasphemous lie from hell being propagated by the President’s spiritual advisor.  It is no wonder then that the press secretary didn’t know what a Christian is; he probably asked another infidel named Jim Wallis to aide him in preparing the statement.

We also have the president’s own words on this matter.  In his autobiography, The Audacity of Hope, Obama tells of one of his daughters asking a question about what happens when we die.  Now this Christian father, that is so obviously Christian, must have been waiting to answer this question.  Any Christian would have an answer for such a softball as this one.  What an opportunity to explain the difference in the eternal home of those who accept Christ’s sacrifice at the cross and those that do not.  What a fantastic opportunity to explain the Gospel to his own daughter.  In answer to this question for the ages, Obama said in his book,

“I wondered whether I should have told her the truth, that I wasn’t sure what happens when we die, any more than I was sure of where the soul resides or what existed before the Big Bang.”

It is sad that this man or that any man would answer this question with the words,

I’m not sure what happens when we die, any more than I was sure of where the soul resides or what existed before the Big Bang.

It is sad that a man that claims to be Christian doesn’t accept what the Bible says about the hereafter and also doesn’t accept what the Bible says about the Genesis or the beginning.  By the way a Big Bang is never mentioned in God’s account of how He created EVERYTHING.

Some will say in reference to this blog post,

Judge not that ye be not judged.

That is an infantile concept and is not scriptural.  It is scripture, but it is not scriptural.  This piece is lifted out of context and asked to stand on its own, which creates an abhorrent doctrine.  The full text reads,

Judge not, that ye be not judged.For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again.

These are the first two verses of Matthew 7.  Now, in reality, I am not judging the president.  I am simply making observations about who he places himself under spiritually and his own words of admitting not having the assurity of salvation.  If there is a judgment here it is based on the fact that one must put his or her faith in Jesus and His vicarious death for our sin on the cross in order to be saved.  I am prepared for that same measure to be meted to me, as I have been washed in His blood and have assurity of eternal life with Him who was pierced for me.

Exit Observation:  Obama’s propensity for choosing spiritual advisors that deny the true Gospel of Christ and also his own admittance of ignorance in a matter the Bible is very clear concerning, point out the fact that our president is indeed not a Christian.

President Obama is once again lying about the Arizona law.  Or is he lying about it for the first time since the last time he spoke incorrectly about it, he had not even read the law.  (Do Democrats just not read anything these days for crying out loud???)  And these stupid people aren’t shy about running their mouths concerning something they know nothing about, not having read the language in the law.  This would be funny if it were a sitcom and not reality.  The stupidest and most inexperienced among us are running our country into the ground and turning it into a third world nation before our eyes.

The feckless president said,

Laws like Arizona’s put huge pressures on local law enforcement to enforce rules that ultimately are unenforceable. It puts pressure on already hard-strapped state and local budgets.

It is unbelievable that a dunce like this could be elected in this great nation!  Mr. President, that is the point!  You are not doing your job of securing the border so the local and state governments are forced to do the job for you.  Get off the freaking golf courses and do your JOB!!!  Mr. President, are you really this vapid?  REALLY?

Then he went on to say this gem of illogic nonsense.

It makes it difficult for people here illegally to report crimes -– driving a wedge between communities and law enforcement, making our streets more dangerous and the jobs of our police officers more difficult.

Elections matter folks and this one was so crucial because we now have a knot-head in the White House who is just an embarrassment.    This is just absurd.  To say that the Arizona law makes it more difficult for illegals to report crimes that they shouldn’t be witness to in the first place if they weren’t here illegally in the first place.  Is this guy really a grown up?  The streets are more unsafe in Arizona BECAUSE of the illegal aliens, not because they won’t report crimes.  Also, if we thought these were upstanding citizens who would report a crime, my guess is they wouldn’t be here illegally in the first place, you idiotic moron.  I just couldn’t believe what I was hearing during this left wing psychobabble of a speech.

These laws also have the potential of violating the rights of innocent American citizens and legal residents, making them subject to possible stops or questioning because of what they look like or how they sound.

I am guessing that at this late stage in the process of the Arizona law, someone in the administration has taken the time to read this bill.  So again, the president is lying his face off while saying that people will stopped based on the way they look or sound and asked to provide proof of citizenship.  This is a lie!  Below is an excerpt from the Arizona law which can be read in its entirety here http://www.azleg.gov/legtext/49leg/2r/bills/sb1070s.pdf.

Sec. 2. Title 11, chapter 7, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended by adding article 8, to read: ARTICLE 8. ENFORCEMENT OF IMMIGRATION LAWS 11-1051.   Cooperation and assistance in enforcement of immigration laws; indemnification

B. FOR ANY LAWFUL CONTACT MADE BY A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL OR AGENCY OF THIS STATE OR A COUNTY, CITY, TOWN OR OTHER POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS STATE WHERE REASONABLE SUSPICION EXISTS THAT THE PERSON IS AN ALIEN WHO IS UNLAWFULLY PRESENT IN THE UNITED STATES, A REASONABLE ATTEMPT SHALL BE MADE, WHEN PRACTICABLE, TO DETERMINE THE IMMIGRATION STATUS OF THE PERSON. THE PERSON’S IMMIGRATION STATUS SHALL BE VERIFIED WITH THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT PURSUANT TO 8 UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 1373(c).

The law states that for any lawful contact made by a policeman or agency where suspicion exists that the person being dealt with is an illegal alien a reasonable attempt will be made to determine the person’s immigration status.

In the first place if a person is stopped for speeding or even for jaywalking the first thing an officer does is ask for a driver’s license or an identification card.  If this can’t be produced the next logical step is to determine if the person is supposed to be on our streets in the first place, whether the person is an American citizen or an illegal alien.

Again people are not being stopped or questioned because of how they look or talk.  People will be pulled over for infractions in respect to laws and if citizenship or immigration status cannot be verified, the federal government will be contacted to assist in verifying who the person is.

Then Obama makes another absurd argument.  I hope he uses better arguments than this with Michelle.

And as other states and localities go their own ways, we face the prospect that different rules for immigration will apply in different parts of the country -– a patchwork of local immigration rules where we all know one clear national standard is needed.

So if states have immigration laws that differ from each other, we’re going to have anarchy?  Then he uses a ploy to try to get us all to agree with him by saying that, “we all know one clear national standard is needed”.  Well, if WE ALL KNOW THIS, then I don’t want to be the one person in the United States who doesn’t know, so count me in Mr. President.  But we don’t ALL know this or agree that one national standard is needed, especially if that standard is going to come from the lying Obama regime.  Coming from the Obama regime the national standard would be clear as in clearly WRONG for America.

Exit Question: Why can this president not make a coherent presentation even though he reads his speeches word by word from his teleprompter.  (Wonder if his teleprompter has read the Arizona Immigration law.)

Liberals all across the country are boycotting Arizona.  That’s fine, liberals have been boycotting logic for two hundred years in America and thousands of years world-wide. 

This boycott is a knee jerk reaction that liberals have anytime laws that are in place to protect our borders and preserve our way of life are enforced.  A country without borders ceases to be a country.  A country that does not enforce border restraints during a time of war is unheard of, at least until now. 

 The Obama regime does not stand condemned alone in this area.  As good a champion George Bush was in regard to the war on terror, he was also mushy when it came to enforcing the laws of the land to protect our borders.

Obama and his regime have soared to new heights of idiocy ever since Arizona passed a law that basically makes it possible for the state to do the job of protecting the border since the federal government refuses to do its job.  It is obvious that no one in the Obama regime has read the ten page law before demonizing the state and its governor for the content of the law.

Then Obama invited the President of Mexico to the White House for a steak dinner.  At the get together the Mexican president chastised the state of Arizona for this law when the Mexican laws surrounding illegal immigration are much more stringent than our own and are even prejudiced against legal immigrants who become naturalized citizens of Mexico. 

These immigrant citizens of Mexico cannot vote or own land even though they are naturalized citizens of Mexico.  Also, it is a felony to cross the Mexican border into Mexico illegally.  A second offense can result in a 10 year prison sentence.

It isn’t enough that the president is on an apology tour for America where he is apologizing to every tin horn dictator to which he can bow the knee and head.  Now we have Obama inviting a president from another country to come here to the United States to disparage an illegal immigration law by one of our states. 

How dare this third world president come over to our country and bash the people of our great land.  While this moron, the president of Mexico, attacks Arizona law through lies and smears, a standing ovation was afforded him by the Anti-American Democrats.

The brazenness shown by Obama in offering the Mexican President a platform at the White House to bash one of our governors is so beyond the pale as to reach into new realms of Anti-American posturing even for the Democrats and Obama.

Below is an exerpt from the speech by Mexican President Felipe Calderon.

It is a law that not only ignores a reality that cannot be erased by decree but also introduces a terrible idea using racial profiling as the basis for law enforcement

Exit Question:  Will this president and the Democrats stand with instead of against the American people when it comes to protecting our borders and our way of life against illegal aliens and other threats to our soverignty? 

Before neutering our country’s defenses by outlining when we would and we wouldn’t use nuclear force, Obama threw out the first pitch of the baseball season as the Nationals hosted the Phillies.  The president appears to be a leftist when he throws the baseball as well as being a leftist in politics.

What could go wrong with showing up to throw a pitch and then heading up to the press box to talk to a former major league pitcher who now does color commentary for the National’s games?  When you’re an idiot named Barrack Hussein Obama, plenty can go wrong.  The first thing that went wrong is that, for someone who grew up loving baseball, he throws with such a peculiar motion that it can’t be said that he throws like a girl.  He throws more like a girl than any girl I have seen.

I know when most kids watch sports, including baseball, they tend to emulate their favorite players.  Most little boys that like baseball, grow up wanting to be a pitcher.  Kids copy the way pitchers throw the ball, including the wind-up.  They copy the way a favorite player walks the mound and his mannerisms, including hat tipping, spitting, and even talking to himself.  They especially emulate the way that the person throws the ball.  No one that has ever worn a major league uniform has thrown the ball like Barrack Hussein Obama.

After he left the baseball diamond things got even worse for Obama.  A former pitcher, Rob Dibble, who is now one of the Nationals television personalities, caused our Stammerer In Chief to wish for a teleprompter and a half working brain by asking Obama,

“Who was one of your favorite White Sox players growing up?”

That seems like a simple enough question.  It would be a simple question to anyone who, as Obama even said he did in his answer, watched and was a fan of baseball as a kid.  To this simple question to a man who claims to have been a fan of baseball as a kid and is a White Sox fan today, our Liar In Chief answered,

“You know uh ….. I … I thought that … uh …. you know… The truth is a lot of the Cubs I like too! But, uh … I did not become a Sox fan until I moved to Chicago. Because I uh …. I was growing up in Hawaii so I ended up actually being an Oakland A’s fan.”

The video below gives another chance to see Our Sissy In Chief “throwing” out the first pitch.  The audio that is included is from Obama’s trip to the press booth and includes Obama’s clueless response to Ron Dibble.

Exit Question:  Do you also get the feeling that baseball was not televised much in Kenya?

At the Obamacare summit with the Republicans, Obama related an anecdote about his personal experience with car insurance.

His personal story is a LIE!  How do I know it’s a lie?  The way he says that liability insurance works, is not the way it works at all.  This moron cannot even look into the way insurance works in order to make his lie believable.  How can he NOT know the way that insurance works in the first place?  Again, I’m still looking for one thing this guy KNOWS how to do well. 

In the lie, Obama is rear ended, (insert liberal joke here), and his insurance won’t pay because he only has liability insurance.  Now unless you’re drinking the same fool aide as Obama, you know that if an accident is not your fault, the other person’s insurance pays for your car to be repaired. 

Your car gets repaired even if the other person only has liability insurance.  Now if the person at fault does not have insurance, you might have to go to small claims court to get your money to pay for your car repairs.

Exit Question:  Is this the change you nitwit liberals voted for?  At least your last choice for president, Slick Willy, could make his lies slightly credible.

I really do want to write a positive blog entry about the President of the United States.  I have such respect for this position and realize that it is a position of honor.  My guess though, is that I will agree with nothing from this office until the current occupant has been thrown out on his rear by the voters.  One thing I refuse to do is to be agreeable just to show that I can agree with him.  Some conservatives seem to think that the high ground is to find things that we agree with this president on and trumpet those to show that we aren’t like the democrats in their hatred of Bush.

As a Christian who is a conservative, I don’t hate Mr. Obama.  I do hate his ideology, policies, and the way he wants to remake America into a community that he can organize ala Saul Alinsky.  My hope is that Mr. Obama will repent of his attack on the American citizen as an individual and will respect our constitution which acknowledges that God has given individuals rights that only tyrants take away.  I do not hate Mr. Obama for this takeover of individual rights, but I hate his tyrannical ways.  As president, Mr. Obama needs to respect the vow he made at his inauguration and defend the constitution of the United States that he is dismantling piece by piece through his power grab policies.

Anyone with morals finds the president’s propensity to lie disturbing at best and evil at worst.  This man chooses to lie when there is seemingly no benefit to do so.  He continuously lies about his record over the past year as president and blames it all on Bush anyway.  Obama has said that stimulus brought us out of the recession, but that Bush did nothing to end or lessen the effects of the recession.  It was, however, Bush who was president when the stimulus was signed and it was Bush’s pen that signed it.  Mr. Obama cannot have it both ways.  The stimulus didn’t stimulate the economy anyway, but only stimulated government.  Not much to fight over when it means taking credit for a boondoggle.

Obviously, if the president didn’t attend the prayer breakfast this would have been an issue with Christians, including me.  In attending though, and in speaking, did he have to make a prayer breakfast into at best an ecumenical event and at worse a pagan, secular event.  Why not say a few nice sentiments and sit down?  Why talk for 15 plus minutes about a subject he knows so little about?  The speech is line upon line of fabrications, misquotes, and lies.  Yes, the president even lies at prayer breakfasts. 

The first lie is in the history that the president gave concerning the prayer breakfast.  The president felt that this history was important, and evidently important enough to lie about it.  The president’s remarks cast the early days of this prayer breakfast as an ecumenical assembly of people that believed there are many roads to god.  The truth is that this prayer breakfast was started by a Norwegian immigrant who traveled, preaching to the poor and battling the influence of socialists.  This was an evangelical Christian preacher, not some anything you choose to believe is fine, kind of fellow.  Again, the president felt this perverted history lesson important as he said, "I raise this history because far too often, we have seen faith wielded as a tool to divide us from one another”.  The president obviously doesn’t realize that his own faith, even in this speech he claims to be a Christian, divides people by its very nature.  Jesus Himself said, “Think not that I came to send peace on the earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. For I came to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law” Matthew 10:34-35.  If the president is a Christian, he does not understand the faith once and for all delivered, he is lying to make Christianity more palatable to unbelievers, or he is lying about being a Christian altogether.  I leave it to you, dear reader, to decide.

A few sentences later the president says something else that is absurd that makes one wonder of his naivety or truthfulness.  Surely someone of any intellect could not really believe what he said.  “let us remember that there is in religion whose central tenet is hate. There is no God who condones taking the life of an innocent human being. This much we know.”  No religion has as a central tenet of hate?  Where has this moron been since 9/11?  Does he really believe this or his he lying in order to make nice with Islamo Nazis?  In this case I really hope he’s lying and isn’t stupid enough to believe the load of Barbara Streisand he’s shoveling.  And you libs thought George W. Bush was dumb?  A fire hydrant could hold a better discussion on religion than this idiot.  Also, if “there is no God who condones taking the life of an innocent human being”, then why does the president?  Is he better than God Almighty?

Now, I’m not going to do a point by point critique of this monstrosity of a speech.  I’ll spare you and me that bit of torture. 

Also in the speech were some shoddy Biblical references.  Obama said that Jesus told us to “Love thy neighbor as thyself”.  This is actually found in Leviticus 19:18 and is part of the Old Law.  Jesus made reference to this law in Mark 12:31 when He was asked by a scribe to name the first or most important commandment.  In answering Jesus went back to Levitical law, He wrote it after all, and said, “The first of all the commandments is, Hear, O Israel; The Lord our God is one Lord: And thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind, and with all thy strength: this is the first commandment. And the second is like, namely this, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. There is none other commandment greater than these”.  You would think at a prayer breakfast the president would come better prepared with statements concerning the Bible, since he is after all a Christian.

The last piece I will mention from the speech is this, “"Surely you can question my policies without questioning my faith – or, for that matter, my citizenship”.  Mr. President with all due respect your policies are what drive the questions concerning your faith.  Your policies do not stack up with the tenets of faith that Christians hold.  Your policies cause us to wonder why you would consider yourself to be a Christian.  Personally I think you do it for political gain.  You sat under the preaching of an anti-Semite, America hating, and America cursing pastor for 20 years.  This makes us wonder as to your faith.  Your statement on June 28, 2006 also makes people wonder about your faith.  The following excerpt is from that speech.  "And even if we did have only Christians in our midst, if we expelled every non-Christian from the United States of America, whose Christianity would we teach in the schools? Would we go with James Dobson’s, or Al Sharpton’s? Which passages of Scripture should guide our public policy? Should we go with Leviticus, which suggests slavery is ok and that eating shellfish is abomination? How about Deuteronomy, which suggests stoning your child if he strays from the faith? Or should we just stick to the Sermon on the Mount – a passage that is so radical that it’s doubtful that our own Defense Department would survive its application? So before we get carried away, let’s read our bibles. Folks haven’t been reading their bibles."  With this childish attack on the Bible, we are to believe that you are Christian sir?  I argue that it is your own actions, policies, and statements that raise concern about your faith, so don’t blame us.  You are good at the blame game though. 

Exit question for Obama:  Maybe your lack of knowledge on Biblical themes is George W. Bush’s fault too?