In his Interview with Brian Williams, Imam Obama is asked about whether he is troubled or not about poll numbers that show an increasing number of Americans believe he is a Muslim and not an American citizen.  Obama answers this by saying that,

I can’t spend all my time with my birth certificate plastered on my forehead.

With all due respect Imam Obama, even if you are a citizen of the US, you are still a lying, socialist, pinko communist, who will be rendered useless by the conservative landslide at the polls in 2010. You will also be voted out in 2012. You will be a neutered lame duck and rendered useless  your last two years in office, you Jerk!!!

You promised transparency and openness while you campaigned for the presidency, meanwhile you can’t even be honest about your birth certificate.  Again, my beef with you isn’t about whether you are a citizen or not.  My problem with you rests on the fact that you are a lying socialist, terrorist sympathizer, and appeaser.

The American people, even the fools that voted for you, are realizing what you are doing to our society in the name of personal and government power.  The American people know who is responsible and we are going to vote your cronies out of office at the end of this year, and we’re going to vote your vacationing butt out of office in 2012.

Exit Observation:  We’re taking names, we’re waiting now for the judgment day.  Many liberals will be judged as inept to serve and will be booted out of office and replaced with American patriots who will do what is right for the people and this great nation.  We will restore this nation to its constitutional roots.

Deputy White House press secretary Bill Burton, when asked about a poll showing that the number of Americans who think the president is a Muslim is going up said,

And so the President is obviously a — is Christian.  He prays every day.  He communicates with his religious advisor every single day.  There’s a group of pastors that he takes counsel from on a regular basis.  And his faith is very important to him, but it’s not something that is a topic of conversation every single day.

So according to secretary Burton, the president is a Christian because he prays every day, talks with his religious advisor every single day, and takes counsel from a group of pastors regularly.  However, though his faith is important to him, he doesn’t talk about his faith every single day.  So, he talks to his religious advisor every single day, but his faith is not something he talks about every single day.  What on God’s green earth are he and his RELIGIOUS advisor talking about if it is never, apparently, about his FAITH!!!

I realize these are not the president’s words, but they are the words of his Deputy White House press secretary.  With this brouhaha surrounding the mosque at ground zero and the speculation surrounding Obama’s religious beliefs, you have to think these words were chosen and not just thought up completely off the cuff.

I would guess that Obama’s religious advisor was at least consulted about what to say as well as Obama himself.  The best these morons, Obama’s religious advisor is Jim Wallis, then you have Obama and secretary Burton, could come up with is that Obama is a Christian because he prays daily, talks about Marxist philosophy with Wallis Daily, takes counsel from a group of pastors, and doesn’t like to talk about his faith every single day.  That is what a Christian is?  I was going to go back and take out the word “morons”, but that describes these three blind mice to a T.

Religiously, what do we know about Barrack Husein Obama?  We know that he was born Muslim.  We know that Muslims claim him as one of them.  We know that he says that he is a Christian.  We know that he sat and listened to liberation theology, Marxism dressed up in church clothes, for 20 years being spewed from an America hating, racist named Jeremiah Wright.

His religious advisor since becoming president is another Marxist theologian named Jim Wallis.  So another socialist dressed in Sunday go to meeting clothes is advising the president.  When asked,

Are you then calling for the redistribution of wealth in society?

Wallis responded,

That’s what the Gospel is all about.

So Jesus came to die on the cross so that money could be transferred from the haves to the have nots?  This is a blasphemous lie from hell being propagated by the President’s spiritual advisor.  It is no wonder then that the press secretary didn’t know what a Christian is; he probably asked another infidel named Jim Wallis to aide him in preparing the statement.

We also have the president’s own words on this matter.  In his autobiography, The Audacity of Hope, Obama tells of one of his daughters asking a question about what happens when we die.  Now this Christian father, that is so obviously Christian, must have been waiting to answer this question.  Any Christian would have an answer for such a softball as this one.  What an opportunity to explain the difference in the eternal home of those who accept Christ’s sacrifice at the cross and those that do not.  What a fantastic opportunity to explain the Gospel to his own daughter.  In answer to this question for the ages, Obama said in his book,

“I wondered whether I should have told her the truth, that I wasn’t sure what happens when we die, any more than I was sure of where the soul resides or what existed before the Big Bang.”

It is sad that this man or that any man would answer this question with the words,

I’m not sure what happens when we die, any more than I was sure of where the soul resides or what existed before the Big Bang.

It is sad that a man that claims to be Christian doesn’t accept what the Bible says about the hereafter and also doesn’t accept what the Bible says about the Genesis or the beginning.  By the way a Big Bang is never mentioned in God’s account of how He created EVERYTHING.

Some will say in reference to this blog post,

Judge not that ye be not judged.

That is an infantile concept and is not scriptural.  It is scripture, but it is not scriptural.  This piece is lifted out of context and asked to stand on its own, which creates an abhorrent doctrine.  The full text reads,

Judge not, that ye be not judged.For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again.

These are the first two verses of Matthew 7.  Now, in reality, I am not judging the president.  I am simply making observations about who he places himself under spiritually and his own words of admitting not having the assurity of salvation.  If there is a judgment here it is based on the fact that one must put his or her faith in Jesus and His vicarious death for our sin on the cross in order to be saved.  I am prepared for that same measure to be meted to me, as I have been washed in His blood and have assurity of eternal life with Him who was pierced for me.

Exit Observation:  Obama’s propensity for choosing spiritual advisors that deny the true Gospel of Christ and also his own admittance of ignorance in a matter the Bible is very clear concerning, point out the fact that our president is indeed not a Christian.

The confirmation hearings to fill the vacancy in the Supreme Court ended yesterday with the confirmation vote.  Elena Kagan has been confirmed even though she is the most inexperienced person to go through the confirmation process in recent history.  She is actually less experienced than Harriet Miers, who Bush withdrew after a firestorm of protest from within his own party, on the basis that she was too inexperienced.  Kagan was of course nominated by Barrack Hussein Obama, the most inexperienced person in any room.

Rush pointed out that Obama basically nominated himself when he nominated a left leaning, neophyte to sit on the court.  Of her nomination, Rush said,

Obama has chosen himself in a different gender, sexual gender.  Identical.  No paper trail, don’t know anything about her, all we got is platitudes.

With Obama, we don’t even know his birthdate for sure.  It was celebrated, by those that care, on July 6th.  Michelle celebrated it by going to Spain with her daughter and renting 70 rooms.  At one point she could be heard saying, “Let them eat cake”, or something queen-like.

We are forced to take his word for his date of birth since he will not allow his birth certificate to be disclosed.  Talk about not having a paper trail.

Some suggested that Obama should just nominate himself for the Supreme Court.  Who better to rubber stamp his socialistic, totalitarian policies than the perpatrater of the failed policies; Barrack Hussein Obama himself?

Enter, Elena Kagan, almost a carbon copy of Barrack Hussein Obama.  With only two years of practical experience in law, she is basically a blank slate.  To see what she thinks and believes concerning law and the constitution, one cannot look at her record in law.  She never served as a judge so one can certainly not look at how she decided cases involving the constitution.

She did however, as dean of Harvard Law School, take a case all the way to the Supreme Court.  This case involved Kagan’s attempt to block the military from the Harvard campus during a time of war when brave men and women put their lives on the line for every American’s freedom.  At this time, Kagan decided to refuse the military the freedom to recruit on Harvard’s campus.

As Obama’s former Solicitor General, the President has chosen a safe bet, in Kagan, to rubber stamp his imperialistic policies in his hope to change this nation into something our founders feared and that every American should fear.  He has chosen a justice who will always vote in favor of abortion on demand, by demand, at any time.  I’m so tired of the left insisting that the right not use a litmus test, when in fact the left holds its candidates to at least a dozen such tests.  I’ll name some of these.

1. Abortion
2. Global Warming
3. Liberal education which distorts America’s place in history
4. Weak on the First Amendment -- for limiting speech in churches, especially speech that is anti-liberal or is against a liberal pet group such as homosexuality.
5. Weak on the Second Amendment -- They will claim to be pro gun, but only hunting guns that some wacko will tell us are OK for this purpose.
6. Separation of church and state -- This never appears in the constitution
7. Against death penalty (except for inconvenient babies)
8. For taxes that go way beyond the constitutional limits of government
9. Dislike of the military
10. Dislike of America
11. Distrust of America as a Super Power
12. For implementation of fairness doctrine and limiting freedom of speech during elections
13. Preserving Obamacare

Exit Observation:  Rush said that Obama’s appearance on The View added estrogen to the show.  Similarly, I believe that Kagan’s nomination to the supreme court adds some much needed testosterone to the bench to balance out Anthony Kennedy and the other ladies on the court.

While similarities do exist, no, the Government Motors Volt is not Obama’s Volkswagen.  The difference that makes this vehicle so different from Hitler’s Volkswagen is that this car is not a car for all the people. 

It has a price tag of 41,000 dollars and even with a tax break of 7,500 dollars, it is a steep price to pay for an underpowered automobile, especially in such a dismal, Obama manipulated economy.  With Obamacar, Government control didn’t seem to help keep costs down?  Obamacare will be different though, right? 

President Obama drives a Chevy Volt at a GM plant in Hamtramck, Mich. In the passenger seat is plant manager Teri Quigley. (Larry Downing, Reuters / July 29, 2010)

 

Many have laughed at the Volt’s range of 40 miles, but that range doesn’t tell the whole story of this car.  This car is not a hybrid vehicle, but it does have a gas engine.  What separates it from a hybrid is that the gas engine simply is used as a generator to run the electric motor that drives the rear wheels once the batteries are depleted of power.  The generator also charges the battery pack while it is generating power for the electric motor.  According to the Government motors web site this gives the Volt, 

several hundred additional miles, until you can plug it in or fill it up again. 

In a hybrid vehicle a combination of the combustion engine and electric motor, which is battery powered, drive the wheels of the vehicle. 

I am a fan of the hybrid vehicles that are put out by manufacturers such as Lexus.  These layouts offer better gas mileage to save money, that’s my kind of green vehicle, while outperforming a standard gasoline powered engine.  The electric motor actually aids in providing extra horses and low end torque when needed. 

I am not, however, a fan of electric cars such as the Volt.  This is a sporty looking car that costs about the same as a C class Mercedes, but it is not a performer.  The Volt goes 0 to 60 in 8.5 seconds.  For some people that is OK, but give me a gas guzzling V-8 any day.  My Dodge 1500 Hemi, could push the Volt from 0 to 60 faster than that! 

As Rush pointed out, 

there’s a $7500 tax credit which means that Obama and the government are admitting that nobody wants this, nobody wants it.  We gotta give you a $7500 discount. 

Americans want and love the combustion engine.  We want to step on the gas, not accelerator, pedal and get pressed into the back of our seats.  Who wants a sporty looking car with a sports car price that can’t get out of its own way?  In metro areas people will risk their lives getting on the highway in these vehicles. 

The similarities between the Volt and Volkswagen of course are that the Volt is being produced by an auto industry that has been taken over by the government and the Volkswagen was produced by an auto industry that was taken over by Hitler. 

Exit Observation:  At least Hitler knew what people wanted, Obama hasn’t a clue.

President Obama is once again lying about the Arizona law.  Or is he lying about it for the first time since the last time he spoke incorrectly about it, he had not even read the law.  (Do Democrats just not read anything these days for crying out loud???)  And these stupid people aren’t shy about running their mouths concerning something they know nothing about, not having read the language in the law.  This would be funny if it were a sitcom and not reality.  The stupidest and most inexperienced among us are running our country into the ground and turning it into a third world nation before our eyes.

The feckless president said,

Laws like Arizona’s put huge pressures on local law enforcement to enforce rules that ultimately are unenforceable. It puts pressure on already hard-strapped state and local budgets.

It is unbelievable that a dunce like this could be elected in this great nation!  Mr. President, that is the point!  You are not doing your job of securing the border so the local and state governments are forced to do the job for you.  Get off the freaking golf courses and do your JOB!!!  Mr. President, are you really this vapid?  REALLY?

Then he went on to say this gem of illogic nonsense.

It makes it difficult for people here illegally to report crimes -– driving a wedge between communities and law enforcement, making our streets more dangerous and the jobs of our police officers more difficult.

Elections matter folks and this one was so crucial because we now have a knot-head in the White House who is just an embarrassment.    This is just absurd.  To say that the Arizona law makes it more difficult for illegals to report crimes that they shouldn’t be witness to in the first place if they weren’t here illegally in the first place.  Is this guy really a grown up?  The streets are more unsafe in Arizona BECAUSE of the illegal aliens, not because they won’t report crimes.  Also, if we thought these were upstanding citizens who would report a crime, my guess is they wouldn’t be here illegally in the first place, you idiotic moron.  I just couldn’t believe what I was hearing during this left wing psychobabble of a speech.

These laws also have the potential of violating the rights of innocent American citizens and legal residents, making them subject to possible stops or questioning because of what they look like or how they sound.

I am guessing that at this late stage in the process of the Arizona law, someone in the administration has taken the time to read this bill.  So again, the president is lying his face off while saying that people will stopped based on the way they look or sound and asked to provide proof of citizenship.  This is a lie!  Below is an excerpt from the Arizona law which can be read in its entirety here http://www.azleg.gov/legtext/49leg/2r/bills/sb1070s.pdf.

Sec. 2. Title 11, chapter 7, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended by adding article 8, to read: ARTICLE 8. ENFORCEMENT OF IMMIGRATION LAWS 11-1051.   Cooperation and assistance in enforcement of immigration laws; indemnification

B. FOR ANY LAWFUL CONTACT MADE BY A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL OR AGENCY OF THIS STATE OR A COUNTY, CITY, TOWN OR OTHER POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS STATE WHERE REASONABLE SUSPICION EXISTS THAT THE PERSON IS AN ALIEN WHO IS UNLAWFULLY PRESENT IN THE UNITED STATES, A REASONABLE ATTEMPT SHALL BE MADE, WHEN PRACTICABLE, TO DETERMINE THE IMMIGRATION STATUS OF THE PERSON. THE PERSON’S IMMIGRATION STATUS SHALL BE VERIFIED WITH THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT PURSUANT TO 8 UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 1373(c).

The law states that for any lawful contact made by a policeman or agency where suspicion exists that the person being dealt with is an illegal alien a reasonable attempt will be made to determine the person’s immigration status.

In the first place if a person is stopped for speeding or even for jaywalking the first thing an officer does is ask for a driver’s license or an identification card.  If this can’t be produced the next logical step is to determine if the person is supposed to be on our streets in the first place, whether the person is an American citizen or an illegal alien.

Again people are not being stopped or questioned because of how they look or talk.  People will be pulled over for infractions in respect to laws and if citizenship or immigration status cannot be verified, the federal government will be contacted to assist in verifying who the person is.

Then Obama makes another absurd argument.  I hope he uses better arguments than this with Michelle.

And as other states and localities go their own ways, we face the prospect that different rules for immigration will apply in different parts of the country -– a patchwork of local immigration rules where we all know one clear national standard is needed.

So if states have immigration laws that differ from each other, we’re going to have anarchy?  Then he uses a ploy to try to get us all to agree with him by saying that, “we all know one clear national standard is needed”.  Well, if WE ALL KNOW THIS, then I don’t want to be the one person in the United States who doesn’t know, so count me in Mr. President.  But we don’t ALL know this or agree that one national standard is needed, especially if that standard is going to come from the lying Obama regime.  Coming from the Obama regime the national standard would be clear as in clearly WRONG for America.

Exit Question: Why can this president not make a coherent presentation even though he reads his speeches word by word from his teleprompter.  (Wonder if his teleprompter has read the Arizona Immigration law.)

At one time Joseph “Big F’n Deal” Biden was known as the dumbest senator in office. Now he’s the dumbest VP our country has ever had. He keeps reminding us of this by saying stupid things.

The latest stupid statement coming from our lowly esteemed VP is an email appeal for cash in which “Big F’n Deal” Biden compares the GOP to Nazis saying the GOP will “blitzkrieg” the Allied Forces which are the peace loving, tolerant, kind worded, and intellectual Democrat Party. In this email beg for cash “Big F’n Deal” said,

As things heat up, you can expect House Democrats will be hit with a GOP blitzkrieg of vicious Swift-Boat-style attack ads, Karl Rove-inspired knockout tactics, thinly veiled attempts at character assassination and tea party disruptions.

Our Democratic allies in the House need your help, and the President and I hope we can count on you to come to their defense so we can hold onto our Democratic Majority and continue moving American forward in a new direction.

Mr. “Big F’n Deal”, by swift-boat style attack adds do you mean adds that tell the truth about Democrats?  Of course we know that any add that tells of a Democrat’s voting record is regarded as an attack simply because the Democrats legislate far to the left of the way the American people live their lives.

The “tea party disruptions” remark is evidently preparing the Democrats who will face angry people as they conduct town hall meetings and as they campaign.  The Democrats, including the dunce of a VP, don’t seem to realize that the majority of Americans want fiscal accountability from our elected officials.  The Tea Party assemblies simply give these Americans a voice.

As to Biden’s comment about “Karl Rove-inspired knockout tactics”, I have no idea what he is referring to there.  Not knowing what “Big F’n Deal” is talking about is no bother to me as he quite often makes no sense, sometimes for entire speeches.  As an aside, his best speeches seem to be those that he “borrowed” from others.

“GOP blitzkrieg” is a rather unfortunate term for any Democrat to use these days.  Of course Mr. “Big F’n Deal” didn’t mean this as a thinly veiled attempt at character assassination, as Democrats are above such uses of language.  Obviously this was meant as a compliment.

The use of the term “GOP blitzkrieg” by the VP is unfortunate because it shines a bright light once again on the lack of knowledge and understanding of history that has become a hallmark of the lefist statists in America.

Anyone with half a brain knows, this leaves out most Democrats, that the Democrat party of today is much more aligned with the Nazis than is the Republican party.  Hitler ushered in Nazism or National Socialism.  Hitler’s National Socialism was of course a racist form of socialism, but socialism just the same.

Socialism, while not always racist, does, in its promise of equal results, intrinsically need a target group that consists of people who cannot help themselves and cannot achieve equal results without the help of a kind and loving government.  Socialism always tries to appeal to the “little guy” or the “working class”.

The other target of socialists are those whose money the government will take, or “spread the wealth around”, to give to the former target group of less fortunates.  These groups are small business owners and the middle class.

So while socialism may not always be racist in nature as that of Nazi Germany, it is always a force for class warfare as it pits one group against another or one group against many.

Socialistic Nazism pitted the German super Aryan race against all others, particularly against the Jews.  Socialistic Democrats pit the poor, downtrodden, and minorities against the middle class, upper class, and conservatives even if these people happen to also be from a minority group.

Obama and his statist brothers and sisters have done a masterful job of defining conservatives as the enemy of those lower on the socioeconomic scale, meanwhile the statist looks down on the very people it promises to help.

The statist looks down on these people through programs that tell them that they cannot achieve success on their own and the statist is more than happy to make the decisions of life for them with the promise of success in life.  This success never materializes as the promise of utopia turns into a reality of shared poverty.

Programs that involve quotas instead of taking the brightest and best teach minority children that they aren’t as smart as other people.  This is a travesty foisted upon the minority population by the very people that talk the most about “helping” them.

So we see that even though Obama’s socialism is not considered to be racist, it has race at the forefront of its being.  Let’s make no mistake about it, Democrat socialists are as racist as racists come.

The parallels between Nazi socialism and Obama socialism don’t end there.  The other parallel of the Nazi regime to the Obama socialist is that they both have a holocaust.

Nazi Germany under the control of Adolf Hitler slaughtered over six million human beings.  There is no way to say that and make it as gruesome as it was.

Having said that, the Democrat socialist, with the help of some so-called conservatives are fighting to keep the American Holocaust in business.  This holocaust has killed nearly sixty million human beings before they are even born and the vast majority of these being slaughtered are minority babies.

These babies are not slaughtered by doctors for doctors take the Hippocratic oath where they vow to, “Do no harm”.  Doctors would not perform such a miserable deed on a fellow human being.  These are murderous barbarians who take innocent life and tear it limb for limb.

Make no mistake that it is wrong to take an abortionists life also.  The taking of an abortionist’s life gives no chance for this person to repent and accept Christ as Savior.

The act of taking an abortionist’s life decides the fate of the person’s soul and is playing God just as much as the abortionist does.  Such a cowardly act also decides the fate of the abortionist’s murderer because the Bible says, “You shall commit no murder”.

Exit Question: When will the American people realize that the parallels exist, not between conservatism and the Nazi, but the parallels are squarely with the socialistic nature of the Democrat Party and Nazism.

Socialism cannot spring from conservatism as conservatives believe in a government with the limited power drawn up in the Declaration of Independence, Federalist Papers, and the Constitution of America.  These documents, followed by elected officials and the Supreme Court, would keep Americans as freemen until Jesus comes for His own.  If we lose the ability to follow these documents due to tyrannical statism, our country will slip further and further toward fascism and tyranny.

This feckless president and his regime are so inept at handling real life problems that it is difficult to really describe an exact Obama Doctrine.  He is a Marxist ideologue so his push toward a utopia of his fantasy world of his own design, clouds his thought process on every situation that arises and on all of his thought processes.  Nothing can get in the way of his crafting of this distant utopian fantasy land.

Since it is well established and has been written of by many people, including me, that Obama is a socialist Marxist, I would like to give attention to his problem handling and will attempt to draw from this observation The Obama Doctrine.

Since the Exxon Valdez oil spill, the President by law is the leader in times of environmental emergencies.  This of course means that President Obama is by law the person in charge of dealing with this spill.  Now what does Obama know about capping oil spills?  Nothing, but no one expects him to know anything about this.

Very few people know how to contain or control this type of spill on the floor of the ocean.  But what a President should know is how to put together a team with know-how and then lead this team. One would think that a team of experts from Exxon, Mobile, Chevron, ConocoPhillips, and even experts from foreign oil companies would have been assembled to form a brain trust in combating this spill.

Here is THE problem with the Obama regime in regard to dealing with problems that arise.  Community activists are prodders; not leaders.  Obama, being a community activist does not know how to put a team together without a lot of yelling and sign holding.  This experience is not helping in this situation and will not help in any other problematic situation that will come up during his regime’s term.

As a prodder the president has prodded and poked the American people with a sharp stick until even his supporters are fed up with him.  Chris Matthews is having his leg checked to see if that tingling in his leg is a medical condition and not a feeling of euphoria stemming from listening to a speech given by the One.

“No one ever spoke like this man”, you can hear the leftist say almost as if they are speaking of deity.  By the way you leftist wackos have set your sights way to low in your search for a messiah as He is sitting at the right of God’s throne and never used a teleprompter.

Obama enjoys the trappings of the president and of being president.  He and Michelle are globe trotting around the world, bowing to every tin horn dictator that will entertain them and feed them lunch.  He enjoys bringing an entourage along on dates with Michelle and shutting down the entire downtown of cities.  He enjoys being able to tell America what we as Americans should do.

He does not enjoy managing problems though, and as we have witnessed with the oil spill in the gulf, he refuses to lead during or even deal with problems.  The time spent on problems just gets in the way of his pressing his agenda through and stalls his attack on the American people, our way of life and our individual liberty.

Obama has spent his time since this crisis began playing golf and placing blame on others.

The Obama doctrine?  Avoid leadership during times of crisis and blame others for your lack of effort and leadership.  Attack the entity at the forefront of the crisis, punish them monetarily and then take them over.

Exit question:  Will Joseph, “Stand up Chuck”, Biden be asked what the Obama doctrine is during the next campaign?

Usually with the left their intolerance is exhibited in the attempt to squelch free speech that does not fit into their agenda through political and judicial means.  The hope of the statist to put an end to talk radio rests in the hands of the FCC and Obama’s Diversity Czar, Mark Lloyd.  The strategy of the left, and Obama in particular, is to eradicate any discussion that does not agree with the socialist agenda of the Democrat party.

Representative Bob Etheridge, Democrat, 2nd district of North Carolina, however, got physical with a student on a sidewalk in Washington.

This student must have been way out of line for this good hearted leftist to grab him by the wrist and then by the nape of the neck.  To make a level headed leftist leaning Democrat Representative angry enough to commit assault, the student must have used some vulgar and profain language in addressing the congressman. This was not the case though.

What made the leftist Democrat mad as an old wet hen?  The representative of the good people of second district of North Carolina was asked, “Do you fully support the Obama agenda.”  The statist of course is above being asked questions by the lowly serfs.  This is a simple question requiring a simple yes or no answer.  This question is not even so pointed as to even be a partisan verbal attack.  It is not out of the question to think that a left leaning student might want to know if this schmuck fully supports the Obama agenda.

Even if this had been a politically charged, partisan missive, an elected official should have the brains and the self control to just answer the question without demanding to know, “Who are you!” and qualifying that question with, “I have a right to know who you are”.  EVERYTHING is a right to the left these days.  Now if a citizen asks an innocuous question of these jerks on the left they demand to know who is asking the question.  Maybe this representative of the people, don’t make me laugh, would rather be asked questions by an illegal alien instead of by an actual citizen of the US?

As can be seen on the video a crime was committed by this so called representative.

Exit Questions:  Will the DC police pick him up and charge him with assault?  Will Nancy Pelosi show she has one inkling of honor left and have this pompous idiot removed from office?

Liberals all across the country are boycotting Arizona.  That’s fine, liberals have been boycotting logic for two hundred years in America and thousands of years world-wide. 

This boycott is a knee jerk reaction that liberals have anytime laws that are in place to protect our borders and preserve our way of life are enforced.  A country without borders ceases to be a country.  A country that does not enforce border restraints during a time of war is unheard of, at least until now. 

 The Obama regime does not stand condemned alone in this area.  As good a champion George Bush was in regard to the war on terror, he was also mushy when it came to enforcing the laws of the land to protect our borders.

Obama and his regime have soared to new heights of idiocy ever since Arizona passed a law that basically makes it possible for the state to do the job of protecting the border since the federal government refuses to do its job.  It is obvious that no one in the Obama regime has read the ten page law before demonizing the state and its governor for the content of the law.

Then Obama invited the President of Mexico to the White House for a steak dinner.  At the get together the Mexican president chastised the state of Arizona for this law when the Mexican laws surrounding illegal immigration are much more stringent than our own and are even prejudiced against legal immigrants who become naturalized citizens of Mexico. 

These immigrant citizens of Mexico cannot vote or own land even though they are naturalized citizens of Mexico.  Also, it is a felony to cross the Mexican border into Mexico illegally.  A second offense can result in a 10 year prison sentence.

It isn’t enough that the president is on an apology tour for America where he is apologizing to every tin horn dictator to which he can bow the knee and head.  Now we have Obama inviting a president from another country to come here to the United States to disparage an illegal immigration law by one of our states. 

How dare this third world president come over to our country and bash the people of our great land.  While this moron, the president of Mexico, attacks Arizona law through lies and smears, a standing ovation was afforded him by the Anti-American Democrats.

The brazenness shown by Obama in offering the Mexican President a platform at the White House to bash one of our governors is so beyond the pale as to reach into new realms of Anti-American posturing even for the Democrats and Obama.

Below is an exerpt from the speech by Mexican President Felipe Calderon.

It is a law that not only ignores a reality that cannot be erased by decree but also introduces a terrible idea using racial profiling as the basis for law enforcement

Exit Question:  Will this president and the Democrats stand with instead of against the American people when it comes to protecting our borders and our way of life against illegal aliens and other threats to our soverignty? 

An often quoted Bible principle is,

The truth shall set you free.

Most of the time it is quoted, it is a terrible misuse of scripture.  One of the most common uses of this Bible saying is when a person feels misunderstood or is accused wrongly of lying.  This person might make say, “When you find out that I’m right and that I’m not lying, The truth shall set me free”.  Certainly 2 + 2=4 is truth, but has it set anyone free? That Obama is a left wing socialist is truth, but has that truth really  set anyone free?

For almost a year there were rumors about Michael Vick’s dog fighting operation.  When the truth came out about what was going on at the Vick residence, instead of making Mr. Vick free, the truth helped to imprison him.  The prisons are full of people that the truth locked away instead of setting them free.

So what does this mean, “The truth shall make you free”?

In John 8:32,

And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free

the truth that Jesus is referring to is Himself.  In verse 36 He says,

If the Son therefore shall make you free, ye shall be free indeed.

Jesus also referred to Himself as the way, the way, the TRUTH and the life in John 14:6.

It is true that The truth shall set you free if the truth being referred to is Jesus the Son of God.

In verse 34 of John 8, Jesus tells us from what this Truth, being Himself, will set us free.

Verily, verily, I say unto you, Whosoever committeth sin is the servant of sin.

So, the Truth is Jesus Himself, the Son of God and the bondage to which we are servants is sin.  We can be set free from this bondage only through Jesus, the Truth, Himself and his atoning death on the cross.

All you have to do is accept what He did at the cross and He, the Truth, shall set you free from sin.